| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Jeff Liebermann" wrote in message ... In college, the senior electrical engineering class was polarized into two camps, analog and ditital, largely by their choice of senior projects. I made the mistake of designing a project that straddled both camps (Secode Selector using RTL and DCL). Life was hell. The debate came to a grinding halt when someone noticed that DNA sequences were digital. So, if you dig deep enough into an analog world, you eventually hit a digital bottom. I'll call it a win for whichever side pays better this week. I've tended to take a slightly different approach, which I hinted at in my earlier response. It generally gets me some odd looks and a "no, that can't be right" sort of reply, but I find it IS a helpful way to look at things - at the very least, a different perspective that can give you some new insights into how all this stuff "really" works. As I'd said, I tend to think of the "real world" as just that - it is neither "analog" nor "digital." From this perspective, those two terms simply point to different means of encoding information for communication or storage. I find that, all too often (again, at least from this perspective), we tend to use the words "analog" and "digital" when what we really mean to say are things like "linear," "continuous," "discrete," "quantized," and so forth. Fundamentally, I tend to see "analog" as simply meaning " a system whereby information about a given parameter is encoded by causing some other parameter (voltage, for instance) to vary in an analogous manner." It doesn't necessarily mean "linear" or even "continuous." Similarly, "digital" winds up with an even simpler definition - "information encoded in the form of digits (numerical values." I've never found a situation where I couldn't use these words with those interpretations. And like I said, it IS often helpful - for one thing, you wind up with a much better feeling for the real advantages and disadvantages of "digital" and "analog" systems. (And you also wind up not worrying about certain sillinesses, like whether power systems are "analog" or "digital" - since the world no longer has to be divided up exclusively as one or the other.) Some people can't seem to wrap their minds around such things, but then, I'm not really going to worry about that. Bob M. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Take apart Ranger VFO drive mechanism? | Boatanchors | |||
| New PC-based receiver at Universal Radio | Shortwave | |||
| Channel-based AM tube tuner (was Designs for a single frequency high performance AM-MW receiver?) | Shortwave | |||
| Spin, LARDASS, Spin | General | |||
| We Need a BANDWIDTH-BASED Frequency Plan - NOT Mode-Based. | Policy | |||