Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old July 15th 07, 04:55 PM posted to rec.audio.tech,sci.astro,sci.physics,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.space
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,898
Default George Dishman says Karl Uppiano is wrong about AM radio, carrier-frequencies, and aliasing. Who should I believe? Why?

In rec.radio.amateur.antenna Radium wrote:
On Jul 14, 8:35 pm, wrote:


http://www.sosmath.com/trig/prodform/prodform.html


That link says nothing about Amplitude Modulation


Try this one:

http://www.rfcafe.com/references/ele...modulation.htm

and this one:

http://ccrma.stanford.edu/~jos/mdft/...lation_AM.html

and see if you notice any similartity in the equations.

Of course, anyone with more than half a brain could have done a Google
search for AM modulation equation and come up with thousands of hits.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.
  #2   Report Post  
Old July 17th 07, 08:42 AM posted to rec.audio.tech,sci.astro,sci.physics,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.space
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2007
Posts: 1
Default George Dishman says Karl Uppiano is wrong about AM radio, carrier-frequencies, and aliasing. Who should I believe? Why?

In article ,
wrote:

search for AM modulation


You don't need to write "AM modulation", since "AM" means
"amplitude modulation". Therefore "AM modulation" becomes
"amplitude modulation modulation" ...... :-)

But perhaps you were considering adding some subcarrier to the AM? :-)))))))))

--
----------------------------------------------------------------
Paul Schlyter, Grev Turegatan 40, SE-114 38 Stockholm, SWEDEN
e-mail: pausch at stockholm dot bostream dot se
WWW: http://stjarnhimlen.se/
  #3   Report Post  
Old July 17th 07, 11:25 AM posted to rec.audio.tech,sci.astro,sci.physics,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.space
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2007
Posts: 1
Default George Dishman says Karl Uppiano is wrong about AM radio, carrier-frequencies, and aliasing. Who should I believe? Why?


"Paul Schlyter" wrote in message
...
: In article ,
: wrote:
:
: search for AM modulation
:
: You don't need to write "AM modulation", since "AM" means
: "amplitude modulation". Therefore "AM modulation" becomes
: "amplitude modulation modulation" ...... :-)
:
: But perhaps you were considering adding some subcarrier to the AM?
:-)))))))))

Alabama is a US state. :-)




  #4   Report Post  
Old July 17th 07, 04:35 PM posted to rec.audio.tech,sci.astro,sci.physics,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.space
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,898
Default George Dishman says Karl Uppiano is wrong about AM radio, carrier-frequencies, and aliasing. Who should I believe? Why?

In rec.radio.amateur.antenna Paul Schlyter wrote:
In article ,
wrote:


search for AM modulation


You don't need to write "AM modulation", since "AM" means
"amplitude modulation". Therefore "AM modulation" becomes
"amplitude modulation modulation" ...... :-)


But perhaps you were considering adding some subcarrier to the AM? :-)))))))))


No, I was considering the fact that "am" is a common english word and
adding "modulation" to the search disambiguates the search.

Google AM:

1,680,000,000 hits starting with "I Am Bored - Sites for when you're bored."

Google AM modulation

16,200,000 hits

Google AM modulation equation

1,940,000 hits

It's called narrowing the search.

Or didn't you bother to read the part about "done a Google for" before
you started spouting?


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.
  #5   Report Post  
Old July 18th 07, 07:57 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 828
Default George Dishman says Karl Uppiano is wrong about AM radio, carrier-frequencies,and aliasing. Who should I believe? Why?

wrote:


Try this one:

http://www.rfcafe.com/references/ele...modulation.htm



Well, what do ya know! I've been avoiding any threads with Mr Radium in
them, but for some reason opened your post.

Handy site, this RF-Cafe. Thanks for the link Jim!

- 73 de Mike KB3EIA -


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
I Used The Wrong DC Cable, And My Radio Started Smoking [email protected] Shortwave 4 June 1st 07 05:40 PM
PING AUK OT Just How Wrong IS Ward Hardman. Not as wrong as the Doofus of Masturbation. TransWench CB 1 August 20th 06 12:06 AM
What's wrong with my radio? running dogg Shortwave 17 February 24th 06 04:36 AM
Karl Rove arrested! George Shortwave 17 October 24th 05 07:59 PM
Radio New Zealand on the wrong scheduled frequency Telamon Shortwave 0 April 16th 05 08:25 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:58 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017