On 13 Oct, 03:55, "Dave" wrote:
"art" wrote in message

oups.com...

If he understood Gaussian law then he could have made the Gaussian
antenna
which requires an element in equilibrium which means a FULL
WAVELENGTH.
I know you dislike the meaning of the term equilibrium b ut here it
is
indispesable.

you contradict yourself now... you told us before that you used half
wavelength elements for you 'gaussian' antenna????

Hi David, back to your old tricks again eh?
If you go up a halfwave length and then come down a halfwaveleng you
then
have 2 x 1/2 so you don't have a half wave length anymore.
Watch the childrens hour on TV for the answer



Even without the knoweledge of Gauss he came very close to Gauss
or the biggest discovery of the century
If one winds a half wave length in a clockwise direction starting
at the top going down and then repeating with another halfwave length
but winding it in a counterclockwise direction( preferably winding
both
wires at the same time) and then joining together the two wires at the
top
he would then have a copy of my Gaussian antenna.




Another contradiction. earlier you have said that the 'gaussian' elements
were simple straight halfwave elements????


You have just got to watch childrens hour to get up to speed for your
mathematics, new math that is.

A gaussian antenna can be any shape, size or configuration as long as
it is in a state of equilibrium



and ONE MORE TIME.... define 'equilibrium'. write the equations. just what
is in 'equilibrium' with what??

No David I am not going to go thru all that again,get yourself a
physics book or Google around
Art