Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
New antenna
On 17 Oct, 21:56, Roy Lewallen wrote:
wrote: I especially liked the experts who wouldn't use a B&W antenna under any circumstance because it was inefficient. Even when the uses included ALE, frequent frequency changes, and use in hostile environments. They just gotta squeeze every last db out of a piece of wire. Any "expert" who doesn't consider the application is no expert at all, and certainly not even a competent engineer. Who are these people you're speaking of, and why do you consider them "experts"? Roy Lewallen, W7EL Interesting aproach as to what a good engineer is. It goes without saying that the application has to be considered, even Yogi Bear would have come up with a better one than that and he is not an engineer. As an engineer myself I consider a engineer or "expert" is one that will consider anything unless science has definitely ruled it out and that doesn't neccesarily include what has been written before the question arises. Natuarally that means not ruling out trying ANYTHING unless one considers their minds developed enough that it is satisfactory to go thru the thought processes only. On that basis this newsgroup is full of fake " experts"! Art KB9MZ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|