Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() 2:1 isn't bad, but you're probably not getting full power output if your rig is solid state. ================================= When SWR is 2:1 the reflected power is only 11% of the tx output power, which will hardly be noticeable at the receiving end . But a low SWR will make the solid state PA of your radio feel happier ! Frank GM0CSZ / KN6WH Frank, I know that you know this, but I want to comment to the group... Assuming the transmitter does not fold back, the 11% reflected power will not change the signal strength... The reflected 11% will be 88% radiated on the return trip (minus any line losses) and 88% of that on the next round trip, etc... So, in the end the decrease in transmitted power is only a fraction of 1% for feedlines with low losses to start with... W2DU's very readable book REFLECTIONS, would be a good place to start for those who are a bit hazy on transmission lines, reflections, conjugate mirrors, etc.... Now, if we take transmitter foldback into consideration, we will need a lot of information about the various rigs before we can even begin to discuss how much a 2:1 SWR will change radiated power... Personally, for a situation where there is SWR on the line, I prefer a DX100B - it's pi-net could not care less and will still put out full power into 2 or 3 to 1... As well as some more modern rigs such as TS-830, etc... Tubes have a lot going for them... The Omni series of solid state rigs from Ten Tec also do not fold back under 2:1, though 3:1 does have some effect... cheers ... denny / k8do |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
who is that guy reading at 476 MHZ ?? | Scanner | |||
Reading SWR with low power | Antenna | |||
Interesting reading from NCI | Policy | |||
Good reading: | CB |