Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old October 23rd 07, 10:19 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Oct 2007
Posts: 21
Default my SWR reading

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi, I just got my new (used) HF rig, and I strung up a half wave dipole
for 10 meters using 28.4 mhz in my calculations. Several hours later I
am getting an SWR reading of 2:1 at 28.4mhz. Is that pretty good or
should I try to do better?

I appreciate any opinions.

Jim

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHHmVGQuDJiZ/QrH0RAnRNAJ9NcIJ58EeREFNwztYV7nkCSbb+hACcDveD
LHfGOxSNluOb7JXvTpx3OLY=
=EEQ7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
  #2   Report Post  
Old October 23rd 07, 10:49 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 797
Default my SWR reading

if the radio is happily putting out its rated power then don't touch it,
keep operating! remember, too low an swr can kill you!


"James Barrett" wrote in message
...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi, I just got my new (used) HF rig, and I strung up a half wave dipole
for 10 meters using 28.4 mhz in my calculations. Several hours later I
am getting an SWR reading of 2:1 at 28.4mhz. Is that pretty good or
should I try to do better?

I appreciate any opinions.

Jim

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHHmVGQuDJiZ/QrH0RAnRNAJ9NcIJ58EeREFNwztYV7nkCSbb+hACcDveD
LHfGOxSNluOb7JXvTpx3OLY=
=EEQ7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



  #3   Report Post  
Old October 24th 07, 01:00 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Oct 2007
Posts: 3
Default my SWR reading


"James Barrett" wrote in message
...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi, I just got my new (used) HF rig, and I strung up a half wave dipole
for 10 meters using 28.4 mhz in my calculations. Several hours later I
am getting an SWR reading of 2:1 at 28.4mhz. Is that pretty good or
should I try to do better?

I appreciate any opinions.

Jim


What are you feeding your dipole with? Coax or ladder line ?I found that if
you use 450 ohm ladder line for your feed the length of the feed line can
cause you problems . What kind of rig are you using ? BTW welcome to the
group !

73 Will _._ ._ ..._ _ ..._ .. _..



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHHmVGQuDJiZ/QrH0RAnRNAJ9NcIJ58EeREFNwztYV7nkCSbb+hACcDveD
LHfGOxSNluOb7JXvTpx3OLY=
=EEQ7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



  #4   Report Post  
Old October 24th 07, 01:23 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 702
Default my SWR reading


"James Barrett" wrote in message
...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi, I just got my new (used) HF rig, and I strung up a half wave dipole
for 10 meters using 28.4 mhz in my calculations. Several hours later I
am getting an SWR reading of 2:1 at 28.4mhz. Is that pretty good or
should I try to do better?

I appreciate any opinions.

Jim


Go up and down in frequency a few hundred KC and see what the swr is in
several places. Depending on the feedline and length it should probably be
lower at some frequency near 28.4.


  #5   Report Post  
Old October 24th 07, 01:26 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,521
Default my SWR reading

James Barrett wrote:
Hi, I just got my new (used) HF rig, and I strung up a half wave dipole
for 10 meters using 28.4 mhz in my calculations. Several hours later I
am getting an SWR reading of 2:1 at 28.4mhz. Is that pretty good or
should I try to do better?


That's marginally OK. What is the SWR at 28 MHz.?
What is the SWR at 29 MHz?
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com


  #6   Report Post  
Old October 24th 07, 01:27 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,521
Default my SWR reading

ahso#1 wrote:
What are you feeding your dipole with? Coax or ladder line ?I found that if
you use 450 ohm ladder line for your feed the length of the feed line can
cause you problems.


Not if your ladder-line is a multiply of 1/2
wavelengths at the frequency of operation.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com
  #7   Report Post  
Old October 24th 07, 03:08 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: May 2007
Posts: 97
Default my SWR reading


"James Barrett" wrote in message
...
Hi, I just got my new (used) HF rig, and I strung up a half wave dipole
for 10 meters using 28.4 mhz in my calculations. Several hours later I
am getting an SWR reading of 2:1 at 28.4mhz. Is that pretty good or
should I try to do better?

I appreciate any opinions.

Jim


If you can hear - and be heard and the band is open - then you're ok.
If you can't hear or get heard - raise the antenna and try again.
Good swr does not automatically mean a good antenna.


  #8   Report Post  
Old October 24th 07, 04:06 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 125
Default my SWR reading


"James Barrett" wrote in message
...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi, I just got my new (used) HF rig, and I strung up a half wave dipole
for 10 meters using 28.4 mhz in my calculations. Several hours later I
am getting an SWR reading of 2:1 at 28.4mhz. Is that pretty good or
should I try to do better?

I appreciate any opinions.

Jim

It's probably too long, but check it at 28 & 29 Mhz. If the SWR at 28 is
better, it is too long; if the SWR at 29 is better, it is too short.
Assuming you are using 50 Ohm coax, no reason you can't get it below 1.5:1.

Tam


  #9   Report Post  
Old October 24th 07, 07:14 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2007
Posts: 46
Default my SWR reading

On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 17:19:02 -0400, James Barrett wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi, I just got my new (used) HF rig, and I strung up a half wave dipole
for 10 meters using 28.4 mhz in my calculations. Several hours later I
am getting an SWR reading of 2:1 at 28.4mhz. Is that pretty good or
should I try to do better?

I appreciate any opinions.

Jim


Nobody else has asked this magic question yet....

How high off of the ground is your dipole?

--Teh
  #10   Report Post  
Old October 24th 07, 03:40 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 250
Default my SWR reading

Try transmitting up and down the band to see where your lowest swr is.
Then you can shorten or lengthen the antenna a bit to get a low swr in
the 28.4 mhz range. If you can't quite get it to 1:1, coiling the coax
at the feedpoint, 4 or 5 turns about 6 inches in diameter can get you
pretty close to 1:1.

2:1 isn't bad, but you're probably not getting full power output if
your rig is solid state.

=================================
When SWR is 2:1 the reflected power is only 11% of the tx output power,
which will hardly be noticeable at the receiving end .
Even when SWR would be 3:1 only 25% of the transmitter power would be
reflected , still resulting in only a fraction of an S-point at the
receiving end.
But a low SWR will make the solid state PA of your radio feel happier !

Frank GM0CSZ / KN6WH

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
who is that guy reading at 476 MHZ ?? news[_2_] Scanner 13 April 30th 07 12:00 AM
Reading SWR with low power David Antenna 6 March 22nd 06 02:35 PM
Interesting reading from NCI John Smith Policy 10 August 7th 05 03:01 AM
Good reading: Jay in the Mojave CB 47 September 24th 04 02:30 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:10 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017