On 26 Nov, 01:33, "Jimmie D" wrote:
"Richard Clark" wrote in message

...

On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 19:57:57 -0800 (PST), art
wrote:

For more than a year you have stated "it" has been done before and
none
of us know what "it" is.

US? You got a mouse in your pocket? Is his name Mickey Gauss?

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

In a way I can feel Arts's pain. When I was 13 I thought I had discovered a
new way of rectifying AC, too bad the bridge rectifier had already been
invented. I was crushed.

Jimmie.

No. That is just Richard playing word games with his "it" just like
Clinton with
"is"
I say I have invented a 160M antenna that is rotatable and directional
and without the requirement of a ground plain. It could have been for
a different
frequency but I chose the worst case scenario.
No, you will have to wait for the PTO to print it before you can
duplicate it
Now Richard with his word games is playing with the word "it".
And he knows full well that hams are not using this antenna design at
the present time.
The day will come when he has to state what "it" is but rest assured
it will not be
the rotatable 160 M antenna.It took him and David several months to
even acknowledge
that you can add a time variable to static law. Now they both
insinuate that
they knew that all along. In a few more months Richard will conjure up
something
that fits his present posture. Until then it is word games that
insinuate but
does not actually state thus his befuddled postings that few
understand.
Art