Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 7, 6:02 pm, "Dave" wrote:
"Art Unwin" wrote in message ... On Mar 7, 4:45 pm, "Dave" wrote: "Art Unwin" wrote in message ... On Mar 7, 2:08 pm, (Richard Harrison) wrote: I disagree. Laws written are all based on the assumption of equilibrium and that includes Maxwell's laws. These laws hav e zero refernce to size as such though many would seek because contrary to what those male enhancement product adds tell you, size doesn't matter. for the word volume. Pertinent factors are wave length of frequency in The problem here is that amateur radio is wellded to the yagi design which is not one of equilibrium WAIT JUST ONE GOSH DARN MINUTE! you have said in the past that the simple half wave dipole WAS a prefect example of equilibrium! NOW it isn't??? have you had a new revelation while i had your old email address plonked?? David, You admit to not understanding the term "equilibrium" so what do you care what I say and in what content. If you consider a half wave dipole as being in equilibrium you have to no, it wasn't me that said that, you said that a half wave dipole was an example of your equilibrium gaussian antenna. don't put words in my mouth, i don't think any antenna is in 'equilibrium' if it is working right, there is always a flow of power either in or out... equilibrium means not going anywhere, i want my antennas to radiate and receive, not just sit there and look pretty! David, please plonk me again under my new server. Thanks Art |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
what size antenna? | Shortwave | |||
what size antenna? | Shortwave | |||
Recomend Size of Aux Antenna for use with MFJ-1025/6 or ANC-4 | Antenna | |||
Question of Antenna Size? | Shortwave | |||
Physical size of radiating element? | Antenna |