Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 18, 12:26 pm, Michael Coslo wrote:
Roy Lewallen wrote: Mike Coslo wrote: On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:57:41 -0700, Roy Lewallen wrote: Richard Harrison wrote: Build a small scale model that can be tested indoors and report its characteristics. Antennas are scaleable. That's more easily said than done. One of the critical characteristics of a small antenna is loss. And to correctly replicate loss in a scaled antenna requires scaling the conductivity of the conductors as the square root of the frequency. To scale to a higher frequency requires that the conductivity be better than the original. Unless the original is made from lead and the scale factor moderate, this wouldn't be possible. If what I suspect is true, would not the coax also need to be scaled? Dunno. What do you suspect? I suspect that the antenna is a tuned circuit on top of coax, and it needs that coax to radiate effectively. So just scaling the antenna wouldn't translate to the same results? - 73 de Mike N3LI - If you are familiar with computor programming then why not model it instead of repeating over and over again this transmission line radiation theory.? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
what size antenna? | Shortwave | |||
what size antenna? | Shortwave | |||
Recomend Size of Aux Antenna for use with MFJ-1025/6 or ANC-4 | Antenna | |||
Question of Antenna Size? | Shortwave | |||
Physical size of radiating element? | Antenna |