Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#25
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 25, 1:31 pm, Cecil Moore wrote:
Richard Harrison wrote: He who scoffs at Terman is at great peril. If radiation was *only* perpendicular to the antenna, wouldn't the beam width be fixed to the length of the antenna? Wouldn't cloverleaf patterns be impossible? What am I missing? -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com Cecil, he is not interested in finding the new, he is more comfortable of staying with the old people of his era. He doesn,t need proof and doesn.t know how to handle it. Terman is the one thing left in life he has, maybe we should leave him alone for eventual sainthood ceremonies for Terman when they get to the milky way. If he is looking for the Proof at the present time then we may never hear from him again. No one has come to his aid with a computor analysis realising that he is firmly set in his ways. Heck, he won't even try our a computor and probably doesn't have a new fangled television |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
what size antenna? | Shortwave | |||
what size antenna? | Shortwave | |||
Recomend Size of Aux Antenna for use with MFJ-1025/6 or ANC-4 | Antenna | |||
Question of Antenna Size? | Shortwave | |||
Physical size of radiating element? | Antenna |