Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() It is hanging in the yard right now and obviously is very efficient at what it does. You mean it's very efficient at hanging in the yard? ![]() Joking aside, I'd be interested in a *NEC file. Is it possible to model, or is it restricted by the number of segments? Robert |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 31, 9:39 pm, wrote:
It is hanging in the yard right now and obviously is very efficient at what it does. You mean it's very efficient at hanging in the yard? ![]() Joking aside, I'd be interested in a *NEC file. Is it possible to model, or is it restricted by the number of segments? Robert Restricted by the number of segments but I have tested enough of the diifferent designs to know what I am talking aboutand only a few can be programed but with limited segments it can only provide guidance. MAYBE one day I will supply the patent request number I received last year as well as the following patent number but the number of insults have ruled that possibility out. The person who is testing it never insulted me and wanted badly to be on the inside of this new antenna. Sooner or later the PTO will provide all. The hula hoop was just a design for checking, The one I have now is on a tip and turn set up for the top of my tower for use with a mesh dish for 160 and all other frequencies. I want to change the polarity in situ !. You never can stop learning once you get off the normal path and penetrate the underbrush. Suddenly the brush is behind and a clear valley bathed in sun light appears and you have little time to fully explore There are many different versions of this antenna primarily to get a complete range of impedences for use as well as determining tilt angle e.t.c. Regards Art |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 31, 9:39 pm, wrote:
It is hanging in the yard right now and obviously is very efficient at what it does. You mean it's very efficient at hanging in the yard? ![]() Joking aside, I'd be interested in a *NEC file. Is it possible to model, or is it restricted by the number of segments? Robert Let me clarify my answer. The natural resonance resistance can exceed 1000 ohms thought with the same design the resistance can be lowered at the expense of bandwidth. These design forms can be easily modelled with or without a dish reflector. I introduced twisted wire into the design to overcome the reduced bandwidth of the other design to bring the resistance down to the 50 to 100 ohm mark for easy match to existing components. Since the impedance resistance is drastically lowered when using the standard design on the computor I am inclined only to use the computor as a guide in that instance. The dish modelled consist of parallel elements which obviously would be a bear to tilt so many inaccuracies are built in except in the case of the assembly being tilted which I am presently researching. Art |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
what size antenna? | Shortwave | |||
what size antenna? | Shortwave | |||
Recomend Size of Aux Antenna for use with MFJ-1025/6 or ANC-4 | Antenna | |||
Question of Antenna Size? | Shortwave | |||
Physical size of radiating element? | Antenna |