Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#24
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 1, 9:18 am, Art Unwin wrote:
When the air breaks down around an antenna it is because the antenna is not in a state of equilibrium. When a dipole is replaced by a quad ala a series circuit is replaced by a tank circuit it clearly shows that the latter is more efficient.This was firmly proven in Quito.Maximum radiation efficiency requires equilibrium. Period Art If you don't quit spewing all this blatant horse crap, I will be going into talking head mode again. BTW, I'm younger than you are. So your claims of age affecting vulnerability to the effects of constant bafflegab and horse caca will tested at great lengths in such an endeavor. The change of the fabled antenna at HCJB had nothing to do with efficiency. Period. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
what size antenna? | Shortwave | |||
what size antenna? | Shortwave | |||
Recomend Size of Aux Antenna for use with MFJ-1025/6 or ANC-4 | Antenna | |||
Question of Antenna Size? | Shortwave | |||
Physical size of radiating element? | Antenna |