Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#24
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 1, 12:57 pm, wrote:
On Apr 1, 9:18 am, Art Unwin wrote: When the air breaks down around an antenna it is because the antenna is not in a state of equilibrium. When a dipole is replaced by a quad ala a series circuit is replaced by a tank circuit it clearly shows that the latter is more efficient.This was firmly proven in Quito.Maximum radiation efficiency requires equilibrium. Period Art If you don't quit spewing all this blatant horse crap, I will be going into talking head mode again. BTW, I'm younger than you are. So your claims of age affecting vulnerability to the effects of constant bafflegab and horse caca will tested at great lengths in such an endeavor. The change of the fabled antenna at HCJB had nothing to do with efficiency. Period. You my friend are a good example of what a redneck thinks. In the past you have bragged about your lack of schooling spouting about the times you didn't go to school. Now you have a license to operate a radio where you can excercise your freedom of speech at will. Unfortunately, as soon as you start vibrating you vocal cords you instantly reveal who and what you are. This is of immense inportance to the rest of us when considering whether to use our precious time to your utterings. Go ahead and be a talking head but you will find that your audio lacks propagation in the subject of antennas Have a happy day and be nice to those around you. You will never know when that last day of yours comes around despite your youthful age. Art Unwin |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
what size antenna? | Shortwave | |||
what size antenna? | Shortwave | |||
Recomend Size of Aux Antenna for use with MFJ-1025/6 or ANC-4 | Antenna | |||
Question of Antenna Size? | Shortwave | |||
Physical size of radiating element? | Antenna |