Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#32
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Art wrote:
"Where must the "curl" vector be placed in general to justify the right angle radiation statement that all your books apparently parrot?" Look up divergence and curl for yourself as I have no special characters on my keyboard and I am a lousy typist too. You can find what you seek in the chapter on Maxwell`s equations in ITT`s handbook "Reference Data for Radio Engineers" This starts on page 43-1 in my 5th edition. No contradiction to Kraus or Terman is to be found. The right or left hand rules are good. Magnetic lines of force encircle the current and electric lines are perpendicular to them as they begin and end on the wire in their radial attachments. Both fields are at right angles to each other and both are also at right angles to the current flow. There is no abberation for diamagnetic materials. The fields are the same if the wire is lead instead of copper. Diamagnetic distortion is a myth. Velocity and loss are hardly different. You need to coat the conductor with a diecectric if you would get more wavelength in a given length of wire. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
what size antenna? | Shortwave | |||
what size antenna? | Shortwave | |||
Recomend Size of Aux Antenna for use with MFJ-1025/6 or ANC-4 | Antenna | |||
Question of Antenna Size? | Shortwave | |||
Physical size of radiating element? | Antenna |