Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
HI
Has anyone bought this small TAK-tenna HF Aerial ? or know anyone that has? Just wonder how they got on with it.? Patrick GW1SXN |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "patrick.obrien47" wrote in message ... HI Has anyone bought this small TAK-tenna HF Aerial ? or know anyone that has? Just wonder how they got on with it.? Patrick GW1SXN Just for curiosity I once ran a NEC simulation of the "TAK-tenna" on 7 MHz at 30 ft above an average ground. The input impedance at resonance is 3.4 ohms, and radiation efficiency just under 9%. Using 50 ft of RG-213 the input impedance is 5.4 + j 12.4 ohms, and line loss 1.72 dB. Maximum gain, at a 30 degree take-off angle, shows -7.7 dbi. Nulls off each end are -14 dbi. With the above results an input power of 100 W radiates 6 W. I believe they claim a low input VSWR. Have no idea how they achieve it without a matching network. 73, Frank (VE6CB) |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Just for curiosity I once ran a NEC simulation of the "TAK-tenna" on 7 MHz at 30 ft above an average ground. The input impedance at resonance is 3.4 ohms, and radiation efficiency just under 9%. Using 50 ft of RG-213 the input impedance is 5.4 + j 12.4 ohms, and line loss 1.72 dB. Maximum gain, at a 30 degree take-off angle, shows -7.7 dbi. Nulls off each end are -14 dbi. With the above results an input power of 100 W radiates 6 W. I believe they claim a low input VSWR. Have no idea how they achieve it without a matching network. Running more models, and accounting for the coaxial shield, indicates a dramatic improvement in radiation efficiency. Resonances are noted to have a much better match under these conditions, and are highly dependant on coaxial cable length and position. The NEC code below shows one version with an indicated efficiency of 76% and a gain in the region of -1 dbi. With a modified version of the code, including 29 ft of vertical transmission line, the input impedance was observed to be near 25 ohms, and resonant at 7.6 MHz. Probably playing around with various combinations of antenna taps, transmission line length, and position would achieve something better. Typically the program takes 2 minutes to run, so optimizing is very tedious. It appears that many of these ultra compact antenna designs rely on radiation from the transmission line. 73, Frank CM Tek-Tenna CE GH 1 203 6.75 0 5 15 0.03205 0.03205 1 GM 0 0 90 90 0 0 0 0 GM 1 1 0 0 0 0 30 0 GM 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 360 GW 3 30 -6.0428 0 360.704 -6.0428 30 360.704 0.03205 GW 4 1 -300 14 1 -300 15 1 0.03205 GW 5 424 -6.0428 15 360.704 -300 14 1 0.03205 GS 0 0 0.025400 GE 1 -1 0 GN 2 0 0 0 13.0000 0.0050 FR 0 21 0 0 14 0.1 EX 0 4 1 0 1 0 TL 3 15 4 1 50.00 16.317575 ! RG-58C #20 Flex LD 5 0 0 0 5.8001E7 RP 0 1 361 1000 60 0 1.00000 1.00000 EN |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 26, 10:41�am, "Frank" wrote:
It appears that many of these ultra compact antenna designs rely on radiation from the transmission line. Thus, the reason folks who attempt to use a balun, feedline choke or balanced line appear to have performance problems with the Tak-tenna -- according to eham.com reviews of the antenna. Ken - WA8FCI |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Friday, April 25, 2008 7:50:21 AM UTC+10, patrick.obrien47 wrote:
HI Has anyone bought this small TAK-tenna HF Aerial ? or know anyone that has? Just wonder how they got on with it.? Patrick GW1SXN I tried to buy one and was stung. Was told to send a Western Union payment and he reckons it never came, so $230 odd Australian. He virtually said in email he didn't receive the payment (told me himself it will be that day) and has written the transaction off the books. So, I'm down $230 odd for the experience and he won't return my emails now. Steer clear of the so called TAK-tenna site, you won't get your antenna. So, all in all, can't tell you how it works. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
That antenna is simply $30 worth of PVC pipe and wire. Don't hams homebrew anything anymore?
-- 73, Cecil, w5dxp.com |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 09:00:03 +0200, Helmut Wabnig [email protected] ---
-.dotat wrote: On Friday, April 25, 2008 7:50:21 AM UTC+10, patrick.obrien47 wrote: HI Has anyone bought this small TAK-tenna HF Aerial ? or know anyone that has? Note the date above. This is a recycled old posting, posted by some moron who gets his jollies reposting old messages. -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "W5DXP" wrote in message ... That antenna is simply $30 worth of PVC pipe and wire. Don't hams homebrew anything anymore? -- 73, Cecil, w5dxp.com Many hams don't homebrew. They do not have to tools to do things like hams of the past. It is often cheaper just to buy something already made. Say I was going to put up something like the G5RV. I have to buy some wire. The wire is just over 100 feet. That might mean buying 500 feet on a roll or ordering it with the postage. Then need some ladder line. Need about 35 feet. Have to get either 50 or 100 feet if I can find it locally, probably not any around now as most TV sets use cable or coax. Also insulators and coax to locate. Things start to add up. Or I could get it all in one 'kit' for much less. Not all hams have a place to store supplies or build things that are large. I sometimes build and sometimes buy. I just bought something to program some radios off ebay. It was a circuit board with the parts on it. I did have to put it in a box. The board only had 1 IC and a few capacitors and leds on it. Two boards shipped was only $ 7.99. The shiping could have more than that at some places. I was going to order a VHF preamp kit but the postage put me off. They wanted $ 12.00 for postage. I could have put 50 of those kits in the $ 5.50 UPS mailing box. The kit was about the same as the postage. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
25 Nisan 2008 Cuma 00:50:21 UTC+3 tarihinde patrick.obrien47 yazdı:
HI Has anyone bought this small TAK-tenna HF Aerial ? or know anyone that has? Just wonder how they got on with it.? Patrick GW1SXN |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
SELECT-A-TENNA, HAVE ONE? | Broadcasting | |||
SELECT-A-TENNA, HAVE ONE? | Broadcasting | |||
SELECT-A-TENNA, HAVE ONE? | Broadcasting | |||
WTB: Select-A-Tenna | Shortwave | |||
I need a new Tiny-Tenna!!! | Shortwave |