Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Smith wrote:
wrote: ... Low bandwidth my ass, a full USENET feed is gigabytes per day. Know nothing fool. Perhaps a valid argument for those on dialup or with inadequate access to the net. Gigs ain't nothin', we move towards terabytes ... those thinking in gigs are destined to the path of the dinosaur ... A full T1 line is 1.5 megabits/sec. The theoretical maximum bandwidth of DSL is 8 megabits/sec and you will be lucky to get 6 megabits/sec. A full USENET feed, one way, is about 130 GB day. 130 Gbytes X 8 bits = 1 X 10^12 bits. 1 X 10^12 bits / 6 X 10^6 bit/sec = 1.6 X 10^5 seconds = 46 hours. So since there are only 24 hours in a day, you need the equivelant of 2 full, good DSL connections just to handle the incoming feed. Add to the connections necessary for the outgoing feed. And to store 30 days worth is 4 terabytes of storage. As I said, know nothing fool. BTW, how you can read my post when you've plonked me so many times? -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Smith wrote:
wrote: John Smith wrote: wrote: ... Low bandwidth my ass, a full USENET feed is gigabytes per day. Know nothing fool. Perhaps a valid argument for those on dialup or with inadequate access to the net. Gigs ain't nothin', we move towards terabytes ... those thinking in gigs are destined to the path of the dinosaur ... A full T1 line is 1.5 megabits/sec. The theoretical maximum bandwidth of DSL is 8 megabits/sec and you will be lucky to get 6 megabits/sec. A full USENET feed, one way, is about 130 GB day. 130 Gbytes X 8 bits = 1 X 10^12 bits. 1 X 10^12 bits / 6 X 10^6 bit/sec = 1.6 X 10^5 seconds = 46 hours. So since there are only 24 hours in a day, you need the equivelant of 2 full, good DSL connections just to handle the incoming feed. Add to the connections necessary for the outgoing feed. And to store 30 days worth is 4 terabytes of storage. As I said, know nothing fool. BTW, how you can read my post when you've plonked me so many times? Wow!!! If everyone was as you, you would be correct! You mean if everyone could do simple arithmetic they would realize you are a babbling idiot who can't put together a grammatical sentence? Unfortunately you either offer substandard ISP bandwidth, or you are an idiot--now let me guess???? :-) Bandwidth doesn't come from ISP's, they lease it from the carriers. Once again you show you know nothing. But hey, you add bytes of usage--maybe you will even find someone who cares or believes you!! Good going man! BTW--are you from a 3rd world country? Can't do simple arithemetic, can you? I notice you have zero facts to offer in rebuttal; just frothing nonsense. BTW, how you can read my post when you've plonked me so many times? -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Smith wrote:
wrote: ... Can't do simple arithemetic, can you? I notice you have zero facts to offer in rebuttal; just frothing nonsense. Interesting ... yawn Yeah, I know, you wouldn't recognize a fact if it hit you in the middle of your forehead. BTW, how you can read my post when you've plonked me so many times? Uh, just psychic I guess! grin Or you a A) A lier in addition to being a babbling arm waver. B) Too clueless to know what "plonk" means or how to actually do it. C) All of the above. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
John Smith wrote: wrote: ... Can't do simple arithemetic, can you? I notice you have zero facts to offer in rebuttal; just frothing nonsense. Interesting ... yawn Yeah, I know, you wouldn't recognize a fact if it hit you in the middle of your forehead. BTW, how you can read my post when you've plonked me so many times? Uh, just psychic I guess! grin Or you a A) A lier in addition to being a babbling arm waver. B) Too clueless to know what "plonk" means or how to actually do it. C) All of the above. I am sorry, I just didn't know who I was dealing with when this began with you ... You are the BIGGEST idiot I have ever seen, good going dude ... you make quite a coffee table conversation piece around here. Regards, JS |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Smith wrote:
wrote: John Smith wrote: wrote: ... Can't do simple arithemetic, can you? I notice you have zero facts to offer in rebuttal; just frothing nonsense. Interesting ... yawn Yeah, I know, you wouldn't recognize a fact if it hit you in the middle of your forehead. BTW, how you can read my post when you've plonked me so many times? Uh, just psychic I guess! grin Or you a A) A lier in addition to being a babbling arm waver. B) Too clueless to know what "plonk" means or how to actually do it. C) All of the above. I am sorry, I just didn't know who I was dealing with when this began with you ... You wouldn't know who you were dealing with if you were staring in a mirror talking to yourself. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
My brothers love | CB | |||
Democrats just want to attack the Bible, they don't want to attack terrorists. | Antenna | |||
Ancestral Importance by the Blues Brothers | Policy | |||
Home Intruder Killed By Brothers | CB |