LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #9   Report Post  
Old June 23rd 08, 02:26 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,339
Default Rebuttal to Richard Clark's comments on my Chapter 19A

On Jun 22, 6:52 pm, "Walter Maxwell" wrote:
"Art Unwin" wrote in message

...



On Jun 22, 6:12 pm, "Wayne" wrote:
"Lumpy" wrote in message


... Walter Maxwell wrote:
Sorry if the posts offended you, Harold, but I'm flabbergasted that
Richard had the gall to post his denigration of my paper in the
newsgroup.


I'd simply like to know -
SNIP


Craig 'Lumpy' Lemke


www.n0eq.com


If you did a google on the author's name and perhaps the word "reflections",
you might get the answers to your questions. You might also discover that
it is related to antenna systems.

Yup. That is correct. this is the third time he has published this
book in the hope of finally getting it right
but apparently it is discredited before publishing by the antenna
group! expert


Art, I wish you'd get your facts straight before you post. To set the record
straight the 1st edition of Reflections sold out at 10,000 copies, the 2nd
edition at 3,000 copies, while the 3rd edition hasn't been published yet.
Nothing about anything pertaining to Reflections has been discredited. Who told
you it has been? If you'd like to look at a few of the chapters go to my web
page atwww.w2du.com.

Walt


I have your book and I don't think much of it. With respect to facts
Richard lied about the mathematical connection between Gauss and
Maxwell. Most of you believed him without checking the facts and I was
dissed. Then a doctor Davis came aboard and showed you where you were
wrong but now everybody was committed and dissed him also. Yes, I was
discredited on a lie , which he admitted to after I was victimised by
all. Now he has discredited your book and you on the basis of what you
call" lies". I got no apologies and neither did Dr Davis
and the lie you were part of goes on to this day. You ask for facts
you got them and they are still in the archives. You are calling the
kettle black. Get back to antennas and stop promoting yourself and
your third book which you claim is now right.You at least got some
reasons as to why your postings were dissed, for my troubles I got
nothing.It is evident that the majority of this newsgro0up do not like
the move under way to change the subject of antennas so why not try to
get along with your fellow posters
or move on?
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
REBUTTAL TO RX-340 COMMENTS BY PHIL mike maghakian Shortwave 26 December 8th 06 08:22 AM
REBUTTAL TO COMMENTS ON RX-340 BY DAVE ZANTOW mike maghakian Shortwave 8 November 20th 06 02:26 AM
Richard Pryor Sanjaya Shortwave 40 December 12th 05 09:18 AM
Richard Pryor 6925 USB Brian Hill Shortwave 1 December 11th 05 12:37 AM
Richard S. Garner---Any one know--- AL G. Swap 0 January 21st 04 01:53 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:27 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017