Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Many hams will recommend you try a home-made balun, multiple turns of coax
cable wound neatly around a cylindrical form. Exact requirements and effectiveness may vary with frequency and the antenna as installed. I saw an interesting talk at a local ham-club, at which the presenter gave an explanation for one reason that the "effectiveness may vary" with these sorts of choke baluns. The common-mode impedance created by many such chokes is primarily inductive (below the choke's self-resonant frequency, at least). The impedance of the unwanted current path (e.g. from the antenna feedpoint, back along the outside of the feedline, to the transceiver chassis or to the point at which the coax is grounded) will depend on the frequency and the length of the coax. It'll have a resistive component (from loss resistance and from radiation resistance) and will usually have a reactive component as well... either inductive or capacitive. If the feedline-path reactance is inductive or near zero, all is well... the choke balun's inductive reactance will (if sufficiently high) block most current flow along this path. On the other hand, if the feedline-path reactance is capacitive, and happens to be close in absolute value to the inductive reactance of the choke... then you've got a series-resonant circuit. The two reactances will largely cancel, the choke will "vanish", and you can actually have more current flow back along the feedline than you would without the choke. If you change the length of the feedline, the choke's performance can get better, or worse. His prescription: if you want choking that's going to be effective at a wide range of frequencies and won't be sensitive to the feedline length, you need to use a choke which will introduce a significant amount of resistive loss into the choked path (but not, of course, into the differential path that feeds the antenna). The usual solution is a ferrite. -- Dave Platt AE6EO Friends of Jade Warrior home page: http://www.radagast.org/jade-warrior I do _not_ wish to receive unsolicited commercial email, and I will boycott any company which has the gall to send me such ads! |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Platt wrote:
On the other hand, if the feedline-path reactance is capacitive, and happens to be close in absolute value to the inductive reactance of the choke... then you've got a series-resonant circuit. This is one reason why an ugly choke only works well over approximately a 2:1 frequency range. Below that range, the inductive reactance is too small and above that range, series resonance defeats the purpose. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Platt wrote:
... I saw an interesting talk at a local ham-club, at which the presenter gave an explanation for one reason that the "effectiveness may vary" with these sorts of choke baluns. ... In 1982, when I worked for Boeing, they flew us to New York to attend some lectures ... Anyway, I remember one guy who gave an hour-and-a-half talk, complete with slides, charts, models and other presentation aids on why the bumblebee can't possibly fly ... it was totally fascinating, the data looked absolutely real!--even though everyone (well, most) in the room realized they were being "put on." To anyone who has wound and used a few dozen chokes/baluns/ununs of varying designs, I highly recommend the "Bumblebee Lecture." Now, I am off to watch a few bumblebees crawl about ... Regards, JS |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 28, 5:10*pm, John Smith danced
around naked pulling on his meat: snip a lot of John Smiths bull**** diatribe Now, I am off to watch my momma crawl about ... Momma still selling her pussy on the corner huh John? I bet she still has nightmares over your conception from the guy that donated her his half of your egg! I guess the old saying that you get what you pay for is true and its a shame your momma had to pay for the other half from some old whino in Bakersfield, living under the freeway ramp in a box! Regards, JS |