"Richard Clark" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 19:11:49 GMT, "JB" wrote:

I more subscribe to the theory that witnesses who died defending their
own
observation, are more compelling than those who would have written for
any
other reason.

This would be profound, if it weren't coming from an "anonymous"
source replying in other side threads to an "anonymous" source.

Two such "anonymous" sources in a series of dialog is very much less
than compelling and lacks all reason.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

I simply prefer not to attract tons of V-agra spam. These newsgroups are
seriously mined and my actual e-mail address associated with this login is
set to dump all mail because of that.

The truth speaks for itself. You can come up with any excuse to deny it.

BTW Gustav is picking up strength