Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 1, 3:25*pm, Cecil Moore wrote:
wrote: I use an ugly balun with an attic GRrV and do not suffer significant back-RFI to my transceiver in the regular frequency ranges. I think that by chosing 1Kohm that may be a bit conservative. In (old) engineering school, we tended to use an order of magnitude (X10) as our highly arbitrary ![]() significant effect. You are doing that too but by using 1000 ohms, you are using (X10 times 2) as your arbitrary cutoff point. Since the filter is an exponential curve, if you chose 500 ohms instead of 1000 ohms, you might even get a 4 or 5 to 1 frequency range. In my case I use two different turns chokes so that is why I think I am covered pretty well. Your information is very interesting; good to see people are actually measuring things! Actually, 1000 ohms is pretty liberal. For instance, on 15m, the G5RV coax sees 36+j230 ohms or about 233 ohms. The balun needs to be 10x that value or 2330 ohms. -- 73, Cecil *http://www.w5dxp.com Why not 500 ohms, assuming a 50 ohm source and transmission line? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Baluns.. | CB | |||
Baluns | Antenna | |||
Baluns | Homebrew | |||
1 to x baluns | Antenna | |||
Baluns | Antenna |