Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#31
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 22:04:20 GMT, "Jerry"
wrote: Wow, Jeff, you are a really smart guy. It sure is nice to know that you are able to analyze this sand over conduit problem so thoroughly. Nope. My guesswork is far from exact. Close enough. Heck, I thought the air would blow out thru the sand. I didnt even consider the sand above the air leak to be immovable. It is immovable, until it moves. That's the real problem. We can consider the sand to be a solid plug until it starts to break up. As soon as that happens, it leaks like a sieve. As soon as it starts leaking, the air pressure available for lifting the sand is dissipated, resulting in the collapse of the sand pile. Think of it like a real volcano. As soon as the volcano stops erupting and belching gasses, the eruption column of airborne rock collapses, heads for the ground, and creates a messy pyroplastic flow. I thought the air would find a path to leak out somewhere between the tape and the conduit. There's plenty of opportunities for air leaks. If the PVC joints aren't glued, the air pressure will probably separate the lengths of PVC pipe. I hadnt thought about using neighbor kids. Anyone that uses 3/4" PVC for antenna conduit, and then buries and loses one end, is certainly not a professional underground construction contractor. He certainly isn't going to use high prices professional union ditch diggers. The cheapest alternative are the neighbors kids. I currently have a horde of them working on removing the blackberries from my hillside. It may take months and result in a few non-fatal injuries, but it's still cheaper than hiring a landscape contractor. Also, more fun to watch. Why would you consider using kids for this project? They work cheaply. They're familiar with playing in the sand using shovels and pails. Just tell them it's kinda like at the beach. They also bounce instead of break at a young age, which makes them suitable for dangerous tasks. I'll assume you wont recommend the OP use water or air to locate the far end of his conduit. I posted some serious recommendations in previous rants. I like dropping a boson's whistle down the pipe at the end of a small diameter air hose. Apply air pressure and it should be hear through a foot of sand. If not, it will surely scare the gophers, which might be useful. Jerry KD6JDJ -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
#32
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 21:53:20 -0700, Jeff Liebermann
wrote: Plug up the other end with whatever is handy. Blow air into the center of the tube. Run your fingers around the edges of the tube and note which way the air is flowing. That's what will happen if the compressed air is not sufficient to blow 30 lbs of sand into the air. The air and the sand will flow back into the pipe in the opposite direction as the compressed air. Hi Jeff, Well, it's been a coon's age since I've seen vacuum cleaners that would let me attach to their exhaust - so that's out. As for driving compressed air into a short (or open). I've done that, but not for sand excavation. Rather, I've used what was commercially called the "vortex effect" which separates the two air current flows you allude to above to create a hot stream and a chilled stream of air. (Elevated or depressed from the average of the inlet temperature.) I used this for cooling electronics in a paper mill. Not particularly efficient, but compressed air was available, and the VorTec nozzle was a quick and easy solution to their NEMA enclosures. See: http://www.vortec.com/support_casestudies.php or https://secure.vortec.com/store_prod...tID=9&prodID=6 This, and some of my fluidic applications constitute a specialized niche in alternative logic systems. Notably, they all work off principles of reflected power that demonstrate palpable examples. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#33
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Clark wrote:
Well, it's been a coon's age since I've seen vacuum cleaners that would let me attach to their exhaust - so that's out. Have you ever heard of a shop vacuum? Usually only available at highly specialized stores such as Walmart. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
#34
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#35
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 15, 2:28*am, Roy Lewallen wrote:
A suggestion for other folks who will be burying a conduit: Take a bunch of pictures before the trench is filled. It's good to include distances to some fixed reference points -- you can write them with a marker on big pieces of paper laid on the ground to get them in the picture. I haven't yet used the pictures I took of mine, but I sure have made a lot of use of the pictures I took of the uncovered walls of a home addition, showing the locations of all the studs and wiring. Roy Lewallen, W7EL We always do this at work and lately started doing GPS surveys of new buried cables marking GPS and survey data on the pictures, This comes in real handy when you are paying for 4 guys and a rented backhoe to stand around and wait for you to find a cable, Jimmie |
#36
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 22:26:10 -0700, Richard Clark
wrote: Well, it's been a coon's age since I've seen vacuum cleaners that would let me attach to their exhaust - so that's out. The problem with vacuum cleaners is that they all suck. I have an ancient Electrolux and a Shop Vac that both have usable exhaust ports. I also have a Hoover upright and a Hoover cannister in the office that do not. Y'er right that it's a vanishing breed. However, you re-read what I scribbled, you might notice that I suggested that one use the air compressor to pressurize the 3/4" PVC pipe. That's because the average vacuum cleaner can barely generate more than a few PSI. They also leak badly. If you're trying to lift a column of sand or demonstrate backpressure, it's much easier with a proper air compressor. As for driving compressed air into a short (or open). I've done that, but not for sand excavation. I have. The clumsy backhoe operator (me) once dropped a load of dirt on top of the steel 3" conduit end during construction. I'm also the idiot that forgot to shove a protective rag into the conduit end. I spent the next two days trying to figure out how to get the dirt out of the pipe. I eventually fabricated a cylinder shaped rubber plug with an eyebolt down the center, dumped some water into the conduit, and dragged the plug through the pipe with a winch. It took about 5 passes for the water to come out clear. I then pumped out the remaining water, dragged a sponge through the pipe a few dozen times, and then let evaporation do the final cleanup. Compressed air was attempted just for fun, but it was obvious that it wasn't going to lift the dirt out of the pipe. Rather, I've used what was commercially called the "vortex effect" which separates the two air current flows you allude to above to create a hot stream and a chilled stream of air. (Elevated or depressed from the average of the inlet temperature.) I used this for cooling electronics in a paper mill. Not particularly efficient, but compressed air was available, and the VorTec nozzle was a quick and easy solution to their NEMA enclosures. See: http://www.vortec.com/support_casestudies.php or https://secure.vortec.com/store_prod...tID=9&prodID=6 Nice. I built several out of the original Amateur Scientist book (which I still have on my bookshelf) in the early 1960's. It worked amazingly well. Much later, I built one out of PVC pipe, which melted. Now I know why they're made out of metal. Never mind the inefficiency. It's the noise they make that drives me nuts. At one point, we had 4 of them in series, with 4 assorted air compressors pumping about 4 SCFM into each, and got it down to about -100C. We started with a group of about 10 lab students, and ended up with a crowd of about 100 nosey students wondering why someone was trying to operate a jet engine on campus. This, and some of my fluidic applications constitute a specialized niche in alternative logic systems. Notably, they all work off principles of reflected power that demonstrate palpable examples. I'll pass. I don't believe in logic any more. Everything can be explained in terms of politics, psychology, and conspriacies. Logic is obsolete. -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
#37
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:02:04 -0700, Jeff Liebermann
wrote: However, you re-read what I scribbled, you might notice that I suggested that one use the air compressor to pressurize the 3/4" PVC pipe. Hi Jeff, I was responding to the broad assortment of methods which included what was the closest option for me of a vacuum cleaner. That's because the average vacuum cleaner can barely generate more than a few PSI. They also leak badly. If you're trying to lift a column of sand or demonstrate backpressure, it's much easier with a proper air compressor. No doubt and no argument. At one point in my career, I found myself with a dead weight tester, calibrating a pressure gauge to 10,000 PSI when the coupling line spit sending a fine spray of pressurized oil past my face. Took me half an hour to shake off the thought of it hitting me square. As for driving compressed air into a short (or open). I've done that, but not for sand excavation. I have. The clumsy backhoe operator (me) once dropped a load of dirt on top of the steel 3" conduit end during construction. I'm also the idiot that forgot to shove a protective rag into the conduit end. I spent the next two days trying to figure out how to get the dirt out of the pipe. I eventually fabricated a cylinder shaped rubber plug with an eyebolt down the center, dumped some water into the conduit, and dragged the plug through the pipe with a winch. It took about 5 passes for the water to come out clear. I then pumped out the remaining water, dragged a sponge through the pipe a few dozen times, and then let evaporation do the final cleanup. Compressed air was attempted just for fun, but it was obvious that it wasn't going to lift the dirt out of the pipe. I've done that too. For a summer of my youth (when dinosaurs ruled the earth) I would plunge down a manhole with a tethered ball. I'd plug it into the downhill side, clamber out, and fill the manhole with water. Then go to the next manhole, clamber down and dig out all the muck that had been plunged ahead of the tether ball. Repeat for weeks. Substituting one central phrase of "Apocalypse Now": "The aroma of it all! The AROMA of it all!" I'll pass. I don't believe in logic any more. Everything can be explained in terms of politics, psychology, and conspriacies. Logic is obsolete. Last night I went to a reception for Joseph Stiglitz where he mentioned being a liberal too much (he was apologizing to the group at that point) and I drew him aside to comment that he had no need to explain his bias as this was the first time in our political history when we had two candidates BOTH running against the administration AND the Republican Party. We laughed at that logic. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#39
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#40
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 09:19:00 -0700, Richard Clark
wrote: At one point in my career, I found myself with a dead weight tester, calibrating a pressure gauge to 10,000 PSI when the coupling line spit sending a fine spray of pressurized oil past my face. Took me half an hour to shake off the thought of it hitting me square. Ouch. At that pressure, the first few drops of oil will give you an instant tattoo. An acquaintance recently had that happen to him. He's now recovering from the skin grafts and laser ablative cleanup. The closest I came to that was getting a hydraulic fluid shower while riding as an operator inside a Rose Float (in about 1968). The floats animation was run by a pony engine and hydraulic pumps. The coupling directly over me started to leak. After 2 hours in the float lumbering through Pasadena, I arrived thoroughly soaked. http://802.11junk.com/jeffl/pics/jeffl/slides/RoseFloat01.html That's me testing the chair position (which was arc welded in place so it had to be perfect). My feet are resting on top of the electrical animation switching panel. For a summer of my youth (when dinosaurs ruled the earth) I would plunge down a manhole with a tethered ball. I'd plug it into the downhill side, clamber out, and fill the manhole with water. Then go to the next manhole, clamber down and dig out all the muck that had been plunged ahead of the tether ball. Repeat for weeks. Well, I missed such fun when I was younger. I worked for the same monopoly. While you were playing in the muck, I was "re-enforcing" 100 pair bundles and working in the battery room. Substituting one central phrase of "Apocalypse Now": "The aroma of it all! The AROMA of it all!" These days, the installers doing FTTS (Fiber Through the Sewers) have all the fun. Instead of summer interns, the dirty work is done by a robot which installs a SAM (sewer access module): http://www.kate-pmo.ch/pages/en/fast.html Despite the robotics and improved handling, the packets delivered still seem to smell of effluvia. ... as this was the first time in our political history when we had two candidates BOTH running against the administration AND the Republican Party. We laughed at that logic. Chuckle. Very true. Worse, the "real" agendas of both parties are almost identical. I noticed that both parties are also against the status quo (which is generally considered awful). That makes me wonder just what they are in favor of actually doing. I would prefer they do absolutely nothing and let the economy fix itself, but that's too much to hope for. Let the lesser evil win in Nov and never mind trying to decode their logic. I should feel guilty for encouraging this off topic discussion, complete with topic drift, but I don't. -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Locating the source of a number station | Shortwave | |||
Antenna cables in metallic conduit? | Antenna | |||
Underground Bases | Shortwave | |||
Pulling Cable in Conduit | Antenna | |||
Underground antennas | Shortwave |