LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #19   Report Post  
Old December 10th 08, 12:16 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Aug 2006
Posts: 154
Default skin depth (eddy current/Foucault currentO)


I only just read this reply.

NOTHING that I have said or referenced supports Art's ideas in any way.
His ideas are totally deluded.


--

73 from Ian GM3SEK 'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB)
http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek


And he's been at it for several years now. I plonked him well over a year
ago. If everyone would stop paying him any attention and stop responding to
his BS, it wouldn't take him a month to go bother some other newsgroup that
would give him the audience he thinks he needs. We'd be far better off for
it. Art's a nut case. Face it and ignore him.

PLEASE!

W4ZCB


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Serious Skin Care Tips For Women Who Take Their Skin Care Seriously! [email protected] Antenna 1 May 22nd 08 04:02 PM
Standing-Wave Current vs Traveling-Wave Current WAS rraa three-legged race Richard Clark Antenna 11 January 26th 08 02:19 AM
Standing-Wave Current vs Traveling-Wave Current WAS rraa Laugh Riot continues Richard Clark Antenna 27 January 24th 08 04:01 AM
skin depth decay art Antenna 64 November 26th 07 09:50 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:05 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017