Art Unwin KB9MZ wrote:



life story clipped to save 300K server room...

Just one comment....Define coupling.


Iwill start another thread which goes
back to my first entrance on this group here possible some of the
newer members will focus on the technical side by looking at the
picture that I hold and not on the man holding it.

That shouldn't be too hard as long as you don't forget to wear your
skivvies when the picture is taken.

I will do this to
lure you all from what you are now readying to do

I'm fixing to go to the bank. I doubt you will be able to lure me away
from that mission.
Money talks, bull#%@ walks...

and you can then determine if indeed I am a man ready for the rubber
room because of insanity.

You will know when that moment arrives. You'll go to the store to buy
donuts and fretzels and teenagers will come up to you and ask "Hey' Are
you Howard Hughes?" "Man! them nine inch nails are the cats ass!"
"Old man, you smell!" "Are you related to Billy Gibbons?" etc, etc ...


To the initial poster, thanks but no thanks,
you have a life to live, remove youself and enjoy the good life.

Will he get a free boat and motor with this limited one time offer? I
know some people who can teach him how to barefoot ski. Some are world
class experts in that field.


--
http://web.wt.net/~nm5k

(Mark Keith) wrote in message

I know from modeling that what he
describes can work as far as the tuning device being able to tune the
dipole. "loop/cap/dipole combo. "
I tuned his 20m loop/dipole thing on all bands 20m-10m. I know the
exact cap values needed for each band.
Big deal....
But it's no different than any other dipole as far as pattern or gain.
It's no different than using an autotuner at the feed, T match, or
whatever. His loop and cap is a matching device. Nothing more, nothing
less.

g'day Keith

When it comes to modeling what you leave out is just as
important as what you put in, some times more so.
My money is still on Art.
Jaro.

(jaroslav lipka) wrote in message
g'day Keith

When it comes to modeling what you leave out is just as
important as what you put in, some times more so.
My money is still on Art.
Jaro.

To do what?
As far as modeling, I modeled exactly what he told me to. He ok'ed the
diagram of the antenna. As a matter of fact I still have it on my
server.
http://web.wt.net/~nm5k/loopole.jpg
MK

Mark you should have no room for complaints. I offered you unhindered access
to my work including the computor programing system which I would purchase
at my own expense together with the programing I used to substantiated my
findings. You refused that offer prefering to stay with the pack and
ridicule all. You have had access to the patent write ups many times as they
have been brought forward many times by members to serve at a ridicule
point and all you had to do was to click on what was supplied. They also
found a very old page that I had describing the loop/dipole antenna together
with the drawings and you are still complaining. I have personally informed
you that EZNEC was not a suitable vehicle for this work but you proceded on
the point that you were proficient in any sort of computor programing,
and you are still complaining ,and now you bring up a drawing that you say
you put before me even tho you had the option of looking at the many
drawings available. I just looked at the drawing that you proffer and I defy
anybody to look at that and know what it represents. Time and time again I
tried to make peace with you but you chose to tag along with those who have
attacked many contributors in the past since they have a long winning record
in ousting many others. You decided on your nest a long time ago
so you really have no reason to complain as you still have your cohorts
around you that tend to belittle all. Your crying now falls on deaf ears.
Nuff said
'Good day' I think he said
Art


"Mark Keith" wrote in message
om...
(jaroslav lipka) wrote in message
g'day Keith

When it comes to modeling what you leave out is just as
important as what you put in, some times more so.
My money is still on Art.
Jaro.

To do what?
As far as modeling, I modeled exactly what he told me to. He ok'ed the
diagram of the antenna. As a matter of fact I still have it on my
server.
http://web.wt.net/~nm5k/loopole.jpg
MK

"aunwin" wrote in message news:RE66c.33727$po.297044@attbi_s52...
Mark you should have no room for complaints.

Who's complaining? I could really give a rats ass about you or your
antenna....

I offered you unhindered access
to my work including the computor programing system which I would purchase
at my own expense together with the programing I used to substantiated my
findings.

Why do I need yours? I have many programs. They all pretty much do the
same thing.

You refused that offer prefering to stay with the pack and
ridicule all.

I only ridicule horsecrap Art. I asked the guy a simple frigging
question..
WTF are you going to do, that his money is on? So far, he hasn't
answered. I don't think he knows. If that is ridicule,that just too
damn bad isn't it...What a whiny ass old fart you are, Art.

You have had access to the patent write ups many times as they
have been brought forward many times by members to serve at a ridicule
point and all you had to do was to click on what was supplied.

Are you talking about the rube goldberg looking thing? I've seen it...
They also
found a very old page that I had describing the loop/dipole antenna together
with the drawings and you are still complaining.

Complaining my ass.

I have personally informed
you that EZNEC was not a suitable vehicle for this work

Bull****, Art. Plain and simple.

but you proceded on
the point that you were proficient in any sort of computor programing,

They pretty much all use the same basic engines...

and you are still complaining ,

Again, bite me Art. Complaining my ass. You just wait till I'm REALLY
complaining you frigging fool. Don't screw with me. You **** me off,
and I WILL be your worst frigging nightmare. I'll stick to you like
dried turd particles on a baby's ass. Everything you say that is BS, I
will comment on. Is that what you really want? As is it, I only
comment on about 50% of it...

and now you bring up a drawing that you say
you put before me even tho you had the option of looking at the many
drawings available.

Art, you frigging fool, that is the picture from the modeling program
itself. I sent it to you. You looked at it, and ok'ed it.
I just looked at the drawing that you proffer and I defy
anybody to look at that and know what it represents.

Jeeze...What a frigging idiot you are, Art.

Time and time again I
tried to make peace with you but you chose to tag along with those who have
attacked many contributors in the past since they have a long winning record
in ousting many others.

No Art. I won't kiss your ass. Tag along? Tag along with whom? WTF are
you talking about?

You decided on your nest a long time ago

My nest? Crap....
so you really have no reason to complain as you still have your cohorts
around you that tend to belittle all.

Bite me Art. I could give a flying #$%^ what the others say or think.
That includes you, you old fart.

Your crying now falls on deaf ears.

You'll think crying...
Nuff said

Yea, I think so....
'Good day' I think he said
Art

Yea, later Art. MK

"aunwin" wrote in message I have personally informed
you that EZNEC was not a suitable vehicle for this work but you proceded on
the point that you were proficient in any sort of computor programing,

BTW, since your memory is suspect, and seems to be failing...I did NOT
use EZNEC. I only have the eznec demo, and the demo did not have
enough segments to be able to model that with reliable results. "I
think it would have been good enough for gov work though." As far as
programming, what does that have to do with anything? I "program"
flight sim software. Not antenna modeling software. What does my
programming abilities have to do with your antenna, or the modeling of
it? Thats easy...None. MK