LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #26   Report Post  
Old March 22nd 04, 05:11 PM
Richard Harrison
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Mark, NM5K wrote:
"What FIRST got me to model his "loopole" was his claim that you could
get collinear gain with his device."

Art`s unexplained claims amazed me so I jotted them down.

1) More gain than other antennas
2) Useable SWR`s also
3) Rotatable with under 200 ft turning space
4) No heavier than the lightest antennas on the market
5) Can be made wide banded
6) Can be made narrow banded
7) Can be made variable frequency operative
8) Can be automated for maximum gain
9) Can be automated for best SWR

As I recall, all those claims come from one posting but the list may be
incomplete.

I responded that the posting seemed an advert.

Art seems to ignore in his "loopole" that tight coupling means
resonances in the loop and pole are interactive, not independent.

Art should produce some numbers to back gain and SWR superiority claims.

Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 8 February 24th 11 10:22 PM
Three short simple questions about antennas aunwin Antenna 81 March 19th 04 12:39 AM
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? lbbs Antenna 16 December 13th 03 03:01 PM
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 12 October 16th 03 07:44 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:58 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017