Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old April 23rd 09, 01:57 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Dec 2008
Posts: 31
Default American interpretation


"Cecil Moore" wrote in message
...
Brian Oakley wrote:
Evolution does speak to origin, in the sense that it contradicts the
Biblical account.


Sorry, but that is false. If each "day" during the
creation is about 1.5 billion years long, there
is no disagreement between The Bible and evolution
engineered by God.

Genesis 1:1; In the beginning, God created the
Big Bang.
--
73, Cecil, IEEE, OOTC, http://www.w5dxp.com


If you look at the word "day" as it is used in the Hebrew language in the
OT, it means in almost every instance, a literal day. So why would we want
to imagine that it would mean anything else when the Bible is pretty clear.
B

  #2   Report Post  
Old April 23rd 09, 12:01 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,521
Default American interpretation

Brian Oakley wrote:
If you look at the word "day" as it is used in the Hebrew language in
the OT, it means in almost every instance, a literal day. So why would
we want to imagine that it would mean anything else when the Bible is
pretty clear.


How could a "literal day" possibly exist before God
created the Sun on the 4th "day"???
--
73, Cecil, IEEE, OOTC, http://www.w5dxp.com
  #3   Report Post  
Old April 24th 09, 01:39 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Apr 2009
Posts: 33
Default American interpretation

Cecil Moore wrote in news:YQXHl.5960$Lr6.2997
@flpi143.ffdc.sbc.com:

Brian Oakley wrote:
If you look at the word "day" as it is used in the Hebrew language in
the OT, it means in almost every instance, a literal day. So why would
we want to imagine that it would mean anything else when the Bible is
pretty clear.


How could a "literal day" possibly exist before God
created the Sun on the 4th "day"???


He created light on the first day.
  #4   Report Post  
Old April 24th 09, 02:15 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 666
Default American interpretation

Gordon wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote in news:YQXHl.5960$Lr6.2997
@flpi143.ffdc.sbc.com:

Brian Oakley wrote:
If you look at the word "day" as it is used in the Hebrew language in
the OT, it means in almost every instance, a literal day. So why would
we want to imagine that it would mean anything else when the Bible is
pretty clear.

How could a "literal day" possibly exist before God
created the Sun on the 4th "day"???


He created light on the first day.


Well, consistent with that, records seem to indicate there was a big
flash of it at one point. And if that was Him, then He is also
responsible for all the stars and planets which subsequently coalesced.
At which point there began an enormous and complex organic chemistry
project which, given the amount of time He's allowed it to work, has now
provided almost an infinite variety of results, including the inhabiting
of at least (and perhaps only) one of the planets with intelligent life.

There are of course a variety of simplified, abridged, and age (or
epoch) appropriate versions of this history, the actual scale of which
is only slowing revealing itself to us. So it's apparent that if a
creator created all of what is, then He is responsible for a far more
intelligent design than the history books give Him the credit for; far
too intelligent perhaps for us to comprehend. Or maybe He is the simple
minded guy with anger management issues they wrote about hundreds of
years prior to sanitation. I don't claim to know.

ac6xg
  #5   Report Post  
Old April 24th 09, 03:24 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 274
Default American interpretation

Jim Kelley wrote:
Gordon wrote:

....

Well, consistent with that, records seem to indicate there was a big
flash of it at one point. And if that was Him, then He is also
responsible for all the stars and planets which subsequently coalesced.
At which point there began an enormous and complex organic chemistry
project which, given the amount of time He's allowed it to work, has now
provided almost an infinite variety of results, including the inhabiting
of at least (and perhaps only) one of the planets with intelligent life.
....

ac6xg


Which planet was that?
73,
Tom Donaly, KA6RUH


  #6   Report Post  
Old April 24th 09, 06:43 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 666
Default American interpretation

Tom Donaly wrote:
Jim Kelley wrote:
Gordon wrote:

...

Well, consistent with that, records seem to indicate there was a big
flash of it at one point. And if that was Him, then He is also
responsible for all the stars and planets which subsequently
coalesced. At which point there began an enormous and complex organic
chemistry project which, given the amount of time He's allowed it to
work, has now provided almost an infinite variety of results,
including the inhabiting of at least (and perhaps only) one of the
planets with intelligent life.
....

ac6xg


Which planet was that?
73,
Tom Donaly, KA6RUH


:-) It's a good question. But there would still be intelligent life
here even if humans did not happen to inhabint the planet.

ac6xg
  #7   Report Post  
Old April 24th 09, 07:17 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,521
Default American interpretation

Jim Kelley wrote:
But there would still be intelligent life
here even if humans did not happen to inhabint the planet.


I once read a book titled, "Is There Intelligent
Life in the Universe".

The last chapter was titled, "Is There Intelligent
Life on Earth?"
--
73, Cecil, IEEE, OOTC, http://www.w5dxp.com
  #8   Report Post  
Old April 24th 09, 06:50 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Apr 2009
Posts: 33
Default American interpretation

Jim Kelley wrote in
:

Gordon wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote in news:YQXHl.5960$Lr6.2997
@flpi143.ffdc.sbc.com:

Brian Oakley wrote:
If you look at the word "day" as it is used in the Hebrew language
in the OT, it means in almost every instance, a literal day. So
why would we want to imagine that it would mean anything else when
the Bible is pretty clear.
How could a "literal day" possibly exist before God
created the Sun on the 4th "day"???


He created light on the first day.


Well, consistent with that, records seem to indicate there was a big
flash of it at one point. And if that was Him, then He is also
responsible for all the stars and planets which subsequently
coalesced.
At which point there began an enormous and complex organic chemistry
project which, given the amount of time He's allowed it to work, has
now provided almost an infinite variety of results, including the
inhabiting of at least (and perhaps only) one of the planets with
intelligent life.

There are of course a variety of simplified, abridged, and age (or
epoch) appropriate versions of this history, the actual scale of which
is only slowing revealing itself to us. So it's apparent that if a
creator created all of what is, then He is responsible for a far more
intelligent design than the history books give Him the credit for; far
too intelligent perhaps for us to comprehend. Or maybe He is the
simple minded guy with anger management issues they wrote about
hundreds of years prior to sanitation. I don't claim to know.

ac6xg


Sure, why not? Works for me.
  #9   Report Post  
Old April 24th 09, 02:23 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,521
Default American interpretation

Gordon wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote in news:YQXHl.5960$Lr6.2997
How could a "literal day" possibly exist before God
created the Sun on the 4th "day"???


He created light on the first day.


That may be, but a 24 hour day, i.e. sunrise to
sunrise, was impossible without the sun which was
created on the 4th day.

Actually, The Bible says that 1000 years in the
life of man is like one day to God. So why can't
2 billion years just as easily be like one day to
God?

The sun was indeed created about 8 billion years
after the Big Bang. 8 billion years divided by
"4 days" is indeed 2 billion years.
--
73, Cecil, IEEE, OOTC, http://www.w5dxp.com
  #10   Report Post  
Old April 24th 09, 07:08 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Apr 2009
Posts: 33
Default American interpretation

OK, so this is getting way OT.
But, since you brought it up...
(skip down a bit)

Cecil Moore wrote in news:Kw8Il.8793$im1.6807
@nlpi061.nbdc.sbc.com:

Gordon wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote in news:YQXHl.5960$Lr6.2997
How could a "literal day" possibly exist before God
created the Sun on the 4th "day"???


He created light on the first day.


That may be, but a 24 hour day, i.e. sunrise to
sunrise, was impossible without the sun which was
created on the 4th day.


Let's review:
Gen 1:1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
Gen 1:2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness
[was] upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved
upon the face of the waters.
Gen 1:3 And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.
Gen 1:4 And God saw the light, that [it was] good: and God
divided the light from the darkness.
Gen 1:5 And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called
Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day.

Notice in Gen 1:4 that God divided the light from the darkness?
Thus the first day. Without the sun. Don't ask me how.
But, the sun is not the only thing in the universe that creates
light. Nor does it create the only type of light. Fireflys
for instance create a bioluminecense (sp?) type of light.
So the sun is not needed to create light. Nor is the first day
defined in terms of the motion of the sun.


Actually, The Bible says that 1000 years in the
life of man is like one day to God. So why can't
2 billion years just as easily be like one day to
God?

The sun was indeed created about 8 billion years
after the Big Bang. 8 billion years divided by
"4 days" is indeed 2 billion years.


OK, that's a reasonable theory.
We could ask Him when we get the chance.

Now: When God said "Let there be Light", What type
of antenna was he using?



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
(OT) Well... Now We See Who Is American And Who Ain't. [email protected] Shortwave 1 January 8th 09 12:23 PM
GODPOD AUDIO: 'An American Soldier Wars for God and Country' -Look, torture is criminal in Christ's America - Fight Back for YOUR Sake GodDamn You - Bushites war for the 911 perpetrators to escape American Justice.that is why I, as a REAL MAN, ch RHF Scanner 0 November 20th 07 12:17 PM
The Armed Forces Radio Revolution - Chages at the American Forces Network (or AFN) and American Forces Radio and Television Service (AFRTS) [email protected] Shortwave 5 June 7th 06 06:44 PM
EZNEC Vertical interpretation John Ferrell Antenna 21 April 23rd 06 12:24 AM
Yep....I'm pro American! Tracy Fort Shortwave 34 May 12th 04 06:26 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:49 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017