Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Art Unwin wrote:
The helix is four foot long and a foot diameter. The base of the reflector is 1.5 feet snip Art A 1 foot diameter helix would be a design for the 1 meter band, not 160. You need to scale it up just a bit. The diameter should be about 50 meters. The reflector should be maybe 150 meters in diameter. This is not going to fit in your back yard. tom K0TAR |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 22, 8:46*pm, Tom Ring wrote:
Art Unwin wrote: The helix is four foot long and a foot diameter. The base *of the reflector is 1.5 feet snip Art A 1 foot diameter helix would be a design for the 1 meter band, not 160. * You need to scale it up just a bit. The diameter should be about 50 meters. *The reflector should be maybe 150 meters in diameter. *This is not going to fit in your back yard. tom K0TAR Tom What you say it should be is guided by conventional teachings and my designs are not conventional. Per conventional teachings it would be very large indeed which is why my design has to be different Actually I want to see if I can lower the conventional take of angle with the use of tipping mechanism plus the rotator addition. With CP I may lose a bit of S meter readings but if I can lower the TOA with the antenna on the ground that will be a big step forward. Any way the antenna doesn't know that it should not work and despite your comments it works OK, but as yet I have not been able to establish the radiation patterns. So I have a antenna at around 30 feet and the other on the ground with a tipping device so the up coming tests should be interesting. Both antennas will cover top band and of course will have gain, but at the moment it is TOA that I am concentrating on, after that it is patterns It is the journey not the destination. Regards Art |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Art Unwin wrote:
On Apr 22, 8:46 pm, Tom Ring wrote: Art Unwin wrote: The helix is four foot long and a foot diameter. The base of the reflector is 1.5 feet snip Art A 1 foot diameter helix would be a design for the 1 meter band, not 160. You need to scale it up just a bit. The diameter should be about 50 meters. The reflector should be maybe 150 meters in diameter. This is not going to fit in your back yard. tom K0TAR Tom What you say it should be is guided by conventional teachings and my designs are not conventional. Per conventional teachings it would be snip Art Ok. So what have you changed from a standard helical design that makes it "not conventional" ? Your original description sounded pretty much like a stock 1m band helical, so if you've done something to pull it down 160:1 in frequency, I'd love to hear what it is. It must be simple and obvious, because you didn't mention it in your post. tom K0TAR |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Art Unwin wrote:
On Apr 22, 8:46Â*pm, Tom Ring wrote: Art Unwin wrote: The helix is four foot long and a foot diameter. The base Â*of the reflector is 1.5 feet snip Art A 1 foot diameter helix would be a design for the 1 meter band, not 160. Â* You need to scale it up just a bit. The diameter should be about 50 meters. Â*The reflector should be maybe 150 meters in diameter. Â*This is not going to fit in your back yard. tom K0TAR Tom What you say it should be is guided by conventional teachings and my designs are not conventional. To say the least... -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Dish Network "500" dish with two LNBs | Homebrew | |||
Kenwood reflector | General | |||
Vet. with a reflector | Antenna | |||
Reflector for Hammarlund | Boatanchors | |||
Reflector for Hammarlund | Boatanchors |