Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Art Unwin" wrote: What others have concluded by guessing is not a concern of mine. Hams with respect to antennas always call for the supporting math as they decry amateur measurements. The sad thing is that hams are not familiar with mathematics. It is quite clear that by adding a time varying field to the law of statics it becomes proof of the validity of Maxwell'/s lawsand vica versa. Thus the presence of particles is also verufied. Maxwell laws are based solely on distributed loads where lumped loads are completely avoided yet lumped loads generate electromagnetic fields. What is the explanation of this when Maxwells laws designate that which is required for maximum efficiency? To look like a wave is inmaterial since a particle at rest on a wave only changes amplitude, it does not follow the movement of water. We then have the knowledge that the sun provides a stream of particles which arrive on Earth, billions of them and of the smallest size of particle known by man and most hams look to the Sun for predictions of dx activity. Why is this so? Maxwells law includes the speed of light with the inclusio,n of mass in his equations so how is this portion of mathematics included in planar forms that are formed around inductive coupling? We know that the weak force is stronger than gravity and is part of Maxwell's laws the same as we know that gravity does not overcome communication, another recognition of particles as is the application of rotation to particles to maintain straight line projection and where this specific action is part and parcel of Maxwell's laws. Why do you all close your eyes to these known facts? Books of the present day are for making money not the disemination of facts. White papers are accepted if they have enought references to other publishings so dissemination of the truth is obviously not profitable, but plagarism is. And it all starts with the mathematical phenomina where all mathematics of the masters are used to provide the validity of his laws. Like other law's Gauss's law of Statics is also a proof of the validity of Maxwell's laws with respect to radiation and is accepted via mathematics protocol. What is happening here is the rejection of the mathematical proof by radio hams, for if the validity is established change obviously occurs and change is seen as undesirable, thus the burial of heads in the sand. Yes, this time we will succeed in our position it determining that the World is flat by denying the mathematics! All of this group is on record of rejecting the mathematics shown by Maxwell and Gauss by refusing to address it such that validity is denied and change does not come about. Art,Art,Art..... you are blithering again! Mike W5CHR Memphis |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Dish Network "500" dish with two LNBs | Homebrew | |||
Kenwood reflector | General | |||
Vet. with a reflector | Antenna | |||
Reflector for Hammarlund | Boatanchors | |||
Reflector for Hammarlund | Boatanchors |