Richard Clark wrote:
More faith and hoping which culminates in the absurd:

Sorry Richard, I am not responsible for your ignorance
which is considerable. Exactly where did you get your
engineering degree?
--
73, Cecil, IEEE, OOTC, http://www.w5dxp.com

On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 15:00:43 -0500, Cecil Moore
wrote:
Sorry Richard,

Ah come on now, you aren't sorry at all. That is probably your worst
excuse, but any port in a storm.

I am not responsible for your ignorance

Given the fog of your memory, we will visit these issues again (like 4
watts in a wave - what a howler!) when they appear fresh to you ;-)

Richard Clark wrote:
Given the fog of your memory, we will visit these issues again (like 4
watts in a wave - what a howler!) when they appear fresh to you ;-)

Our QRP friends would like for you to prove that
a wave cannot deliver 4 joules/sec through a transmission
line to an antenna. That 4 joules/sec can be measured by
a Bird wattmeter installed anywhere on the transmission
line.

Do you think that advertising a 100 milliwatt
laser is false advertising?

Again, exactly where did you get your Electrical
Engineering and/or Physics degrees?
--
73, Cecil, IEEE, OOTC, http://www.w5dxp.com

On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 15:36:28 -0500, Cecil Moore
wrote:

Richard Clark wrote:
Given the fog of your memory, we will visit these issues again (like 4
watts in a wave - what a howler!) when they appear fresh to you ;-)

Our QRP friends would like for you to prove

Watts in a wave (and still howlin'): the Aurora Cecealis....
QED

Need more proof? Tonight, turn out the lights and read a book on
optics. ;-)

Richard Clark wrote:
Watts in a wave (and still howlin')

No joules/second in a wave - now that's a howl.
No watts/unit-area in irradiance either? :-)
--
73, Cecil, IEEE, OOTC, http://www.w5dxp.com