Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 16, 9:48*pm, Cecil Moore wrote:
Art Unwin wrote: Both sides should be able to understand what the other is saying! Don't worry about it, Art. My dog doesn't understand it either. -- 73, Cecil, IEEE, OOTC, *http://www.w5dxp.com I don't worry about it Cecil but I am concerned at the number of people who consider themselves engineers. Remember that nobody on this group has a true understanding of Maxwells equations! Nobody has proved Maxwell's laws can be proved by adding a time varing field to the Gaussian law of Statics. In fact, it is denied by ALL on this group, Engineers? That to even try is illegal as well as not being correct! Real qualified engineers? And you want this group to understand phase change and travelling waves without the group coming to a consensus on Maxwell's laws? Especially when they demand a definition of equilibrium? Maxwell;'s laws do not include lumped loads in his equations for maximum radiation efficiency, so why do hams use lumped loads with their antennas? Maxwell;'s laws demand that for maximum efficiency equilibrium must be kept, yet hams continue to place verticals at right angles to the earth's surface. And it goes on and on. And engineers continue to misuse what is known as Maxwell's equations. However, despite that I do have a honest question Does the TOA of a dish antenna (CP) change with height similar to other polarisations? Regards Art |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Dish Network "500" dish with two LNBs | Homebrew | |||
Kenwood reflector | General | |||
Vet. with a reflector | Antenna | |||
Reflector for Hammarlund | Boatanchors | |||
Reflector for Hammarlund | Boatanchors |