Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 4, 9:33*am, Michael Coslo wrote:
Dave wrote: "Art Unwin" wrote in message .... On Sep 3, 6:14 pm, "Dave" wrote: David, you can find the famous "exclusion principle" by Wolfgang Pauli in any book on Quantum Mechanics. ah, bringing the Pauli Exclusion Principle in on the discusion now, that is a new one i think... can we now not have any of your magical levitating diamagnetic neutrinos on an antenna in the same quantum states?? Drum roll........ *From the department of everything you knew about physics is wrong department...... The Coriolis effect upon RF radiation has some interesting other ramifications. Since Coriolis affects radio waves, it follows that gravity also affects radio waves. This bring up a new and much simplified explanation for radio propagation. As the RF spins away from the antenna, the coriolis effect and gravity eventually pull the signal back to earth far away from the originating point. I always thought that that silly stuff about atmospheric layers and ionization was kind of dum anyhow. Each time the RF hits the earth, a new point of reference is made, and the signal bounces up with a new twist to it. We're still working on why UHF + signals don't do this. Maybe their twist is going the other way, so instead of coming back down, they spin upwards never to be seen again. * * * * - 73 de Mike N3LI - Mike you forget. I do not subscribe to the wave theory over the particle aproach. I cannot see any other way to fit that "radiation is from the acceleration of a charge". And I can not find any explanation of this in any books. Only mass is able to have spin and at the same time transport energy, at least to my mind. Therefore accelaration is the creation of two forces that are not in the same plain ala a shear action where the combination of gravity and the Coriolis force are the weakest forces known in the std model. I would remind you that spin is a result of a force applied where the reaction force is not in the same plane, otherwise referred to as torque ala force times distance. It is quite easy to show that current flow consists of a direct vector and a circular vector within a boundary and where a direct vector and a circular vector on the outside of the boundary creats a condition of equilibrium. This is just physics per our Universe and now many want to deny physics by intuition alone. I would also remind everybody that engineering, electrical, mechanical or what ever is a subset of the subject of physics where concentration of learning is of a niche of the physics . |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Force 12 - C3S | Antenna | |||
Air Force 1 | Shortwave | |||
Air Force One | Shortwave | |||
FS: Force 12 | Swap | |||
Force 12 C-4 | Antenna |