On Sep 6, 7:38*pm, Art Unwin wrote:
Equilibrium is when there is no gain. When this occurs there is
polarisation purity.
____________

So you say, Art.

Note that a useful and practical antenna with "no gain," i.e., an
isotropic radiator, does not exist in the real world.

So what good is your concept of "equilibrium?"

RF

On Sep 6, 8:09*pm, Richard Fry wrote:
On Sep 6, 7:38*pm, Art Unwin wrote: Equilibrium is when there is no gain. When this occurs there is
polarisation purity.

____________

So you say, Art.

Note that a useful and practical antenna with "no gain," i.e., an
isotropic radiator, does not exist in the real world.

So what good is your concept of "equilibrium?"

RF

Enough! You did not get on the stage with respect to the laws of Gauss
and Maxwell so I must assume you are shooting from the hip.It is not
to late to add to the static /dynamic boundary question assuming you
are an engineer of some sort. Other than that.....

On Sep 6, 8:25*pm, Art Unwin wrote:
Enough! You did not get on the stage with respect to the laws of Gauss
and Maxwell so I must assume you are shooting from the hip...

Probably most readers of your posts on this subject (including yours
truly) don't wish even to _appear_ to support your stated point of
view on this subject, so far.

Still, I suspect that most/all of us are willing to be convinced
otherwise, if you can supply any legitimate reason(s) for us to do so.

The next step is yours, Art.

RF