Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Lostgallifreyan wrote:
. . . Note that the idea that has caught my attention is to use transformers.. there would be no direct current contact between either the line and the antenna, or the line and the receiver. This isn't my own idea, it's just a wheeze that looks most interesting because it looks like it ought to work, and if it does it certainly pretects the receiver input rather well. It's beginning to look as if choosing coax or twin line isn't so important as knowing if that transformer scheme is valid, so long as I do something to block common mode currents with a choke balun on the line. An ideal transformer will effect perfect current balance. What I don't know, and have never seen any theoretical or experimental work on, is how effective a real physical transformer can be made to be in that regard. There will be capacitive coupling between windings which could be a source of common mode current (current imbalance), and it might be necessary to take some or a lot of care in the winding to maintain good balance. And of course the system will have the windings' impedance between the conductors, necessitating care in transformer design for that reason. A fundamental advantage of the balun type connection is that the balance improves as the winding coupling becomes more intimate, while that tends to work against a conventional transformer. It would be an interesting study -- I regret I don't have the time to dig into it more. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roy Lewallen wrote in
: Lostgallifreyan wrote: . . . Note that the idea that has caught my attention is to use transformers.. there would be no direct current contact between either the line and the antenna, or the line and the receiver. This isn't my own idea, it's just a wheeze that looks most interesting because it looks like it ought to work, and if it does it certainly pretects the receiver input rather well. It's beginning to look as if choosing coax or twin line isn't so important as knowing if that transformer scheme is valid, so long as I do something to block common mode currents with a choke balun on the line. An ideal transformer will effect perfect current balance. What I don't know, and have never seen any theoretical or experimental work on, is how effective a real physical transformer can be made to be in that regard. There will be capacitive coupling between windings which could be a source of common mode current (current imbalance), and it might be necessary to take some or a lot of care in the winding to maintain good balance. And of course the system will have the windings' impedance between the conductors, necessitating care in transformer design for that reason. A fundamental advantage of the balun type connection is that the balance improves as the winding coupling becomes more intimate, while that tends to work against a conventional transformer. It would be an interesting study -- I regret I don't have the time to dig into it more. Roy Lewallen, W7EL I'll give it a go, though I don't know if what I try will have enough rigour to give useful results back. I just sent a cheque for some FT114-43 toroids which are big enough to consider a screen between windings, though as Richard Clarke said, it might be awkward finding the best point to tie that screen to. Re impedance of windings, I have no idea or plan except to aim for close spacing (within each coil) and neat symmetry, and glue to keep them in place so that whatever results it remains steady. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Kaito KA2100 external SW antenna impedance? | Shortwave | |||
Sangean ATS-505 Receiver - Improving your Shortwave Radio Reception with an External Shortwave Listener's (SWL) Antenna | Shortwave | |||
PMR external antenna | Antenna | |||
external antenna.... | Antenna | |||
DX-398 and External Antenna | Shortwave |