Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Clark wrote in
: On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 14:44:31 -0600, Lostgallifreyan wrote: Again, I wonder why they're even there. Isn't it easier to put a gain stage after the second toroid? A circuit serves more purposes than gain. Of course, the simple circuitry found in the file we are discussing has limited offerings. Of what is offered is controlling input and output Z which is not a trivial matter. My preference is found in using Operational Amplifiers instead of discrete transistors. There is more design flexibility and more purposes may be served. OpAmps will control input and output Z with far more rigidity (it is very difficult for externalities to shift these parameters making for a rock solid design). OpAmps will also preserve fidelity (faithful phase, magnitude) and not introduce any distortion, and will drive out noise not already in the signal. Other advantages can be obtained, but this is enough. I really like op-amps too, they have often made my life easier. Not used them in RF though, just audio and modest DC instrumentation designs of my own.. About those amps in that scheme, I think I didn't grasp what they were doing, other than gain, because I assumed the idea of balancing implied by the design would be central whether they were used or not. It still seems to me that if the line worked without them, then a single stage could be applied after the signal passed to the unbalanced input after the second toroid. If not (as in not possible as opposed to merely awkward), then I'm still missing something. If I put up conspicuous loops here I might get people bothering me about planning permission or some other means of negative compulsion. ![]() can do this with a vertical whip it will be much less awkward. Practicality needs to be served too. Loops can be useful indoors as well, and they needn't fill a room. They will test the limits of balance with the nearby clutter - an opportunity to turn your environment into an RF lab. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC I'll definitely read up on loops. (Been reading the first of two USMC radio handbooks today, second is an update of the one I found yesterday. No loops mentioned in first, but the second is specific to antennas. Both guides are quickly filling forgotten gaps in what I knew, plus showing me plenty I didn't). Btw, how critical is the resistance of wire in a few ground radials? I have some thin stainless steel wire that would be strong and enduring out there but at around 1.5 ohms or more per 6 inches I can't help thinking that's too much. I like the idea though, because clamping ends of it very firmly between copper washers could be fast and easy for good and reliable contact. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Kaito KA2100 external SW antenna impedance? | Shortwave | |||
Sangean ATS-505 Receiver - Improving your Shortwave Radio Reception with an External Shortwave Listener's (SWL) Antenna | Shortwave | |||
PMR external antenna | Antenna | |||
external antenna.... | Antenna | |||
DX-398 and External Antenna | Shortwave |