On Feb 26, 11:10*pm, wrote:
Art Unwin wrote:
I made a time varying field addition to a static field in equilibrium
some time back. All on this group said it was and still is B.S.!
It was this finding that created the basis of a new antenna science
that I have shared with this group and with page Unwin antennas.
If one goes to
* * * * * * * * * * * * *http://www.james-clerk-maxwell.com/

One finds another crank web site put up by an Aether kook.

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

An "Aether kook" is one that recognises that if you rub two
dielectrics together you generate a charge, the basis of
communication. You do this when it is dry and you walk across a carpet
that has resistance or rubbing two balloons together. The same thing
happens in reverse when the atmosphere or wind/atmosphere brushes
against matter at ground level, again there is a charge generated. Now
we look at a particle moving thru the Aether, again a charge is
generated.
In this instance hams know that the impedance of the air is 377 ohms
so the particle is generating a charge just like the other instances.
It also does the same in the weather cycle
with clouds. As hams we are all very familiar with the idea of what
would appear to be nothing actually has a resistance of a dielectric
thus it cannot be nothing if it can generate friction. The Aether
argument started years ago and is directly connected to the time
varying field made dynamic as Newton envisioned. Thus it is static
charge that is the basics of physics and electricity is a subset of
that and thus we must re examine all physics
analysis done in the last 100 years to see how this mathematical error
slanted things the wrong way. A partical duallity is just a very small
part of what must now be re examined.
All of this is a culmination of what I have stated before where
physics relied to much on mathematical numbers instead of the
observations that provided those numbers which has now put physics
behind over a century. In other words mathematics became a priority
over observation which is the core of the Universe.