Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 5 Jun 2010 21:49:32 +0000 (UTC), "Geoffrey S. Mendelson"
wrote: I recently was able to use a crimp on tool for F connectors for RG-6 quad shield coax. Hopefully, it was a "push-on" tool and connector http://www.arrisistore.com/digicon/Digicon-F-Connector-Installation-Guide.pdf not the piece of junk with the small crimped ring. To make sure everyone understands, I am in Israel, and RG-6 quad shield coax is cheap and easy to find. There's quality RG-6a/u and junk. On the left coast of the USA, we have both in copious quantities. I obtain mine directly from a satellite DTV install company, so the quality is more towards quality than junk. Pl-259 connectors, called "UHF" connectors here are rare items. Be thankful. I find them to be a necessary evil as most ham radios require them. Meanwhile, commercial radios are moving away from UHF and toward other connectors, such as Type-N, BNC, TNC, Mini-UHF, and SMA. However, Comerica base antennas remain UHF or Type-N. BNC to PL-259 adaptors, are easy to get, and can be ordered from a reliable local souce for a relatively small price. The same with N to PL-259. That's what I do. Most of my cables are NOT terminated with UHF connectors. If I need to go to UHF, I use an adapter. Looking around at the crimp-on F connectors before I ordered them, I found that you can get crimp on BNC connectors for RG-6 quad shield coax. Yes, they work. I use quite a bit of RG-6a/u and prefer to have everything terminated by the same connector, which is the CATV standard F connector. If I need BNC, I use an adapter. Here's my questions, Note when I say crimp-on, I mean the ones that crimp from the rear, like commerical F connectors, not the ones that crimp around the plug. I have never been able to get any of them to "fit right": Agreed. The good ones are "push on" F connectors. 1. Can I connect a 75ohm BNC plug (which is a different size) to a 50oHm BNC socket? There are such things as real 75 ohm BNC plugs and jacks. They're easy to recognize because they lack the PTFE dielectric. The 75 ohm connectors will mate properly with the 50 ohm connectors. There is little risk of VSWR problems from using 50 ohm connectors on RG-6a/u. http://www.qsl.net/n9zia/wireless/75_ohm_hardline.html Basically, any small loss from VSWR is compensated by the lower loss per meter of RG-6a/u as compared to RG-58a/u. Methinks you're safe using all 50 ohm connectors.[1] 2. Are there crimp on 50 ohm BNC plugs which will work with RG6 quad shield? I know there are variations, but most are similar in size. They're nearly identical in dimensions. The 50 ohm variety have some manner of PTFE dielectric. The 75 ohm variety use a plastic disk and no dielectric. http://www.amphenolconnex.com/products/bnc.asp "50 ohm and 75 ohm connectors are intermateable to ensure non-destructive mating" The catch is that there's no guarantee that this is true between different manufacturers. I've blundered across mutations and variations that are NOT interchangeable. 3. Are there crimp on N connectors that would fit the RG6 quad shield coax? More likely due to the size a crimp on center element that screws into the plug body? Probably, but I wouldn't use one. Just terminate in an F connector, and use an F to N adapter. The price will probably be the same or less. However, if you must go direct, any N connector that will fit RG-59a/u will usually work with RG-6a/u. The problem is that depending on the number of shields in the RG-6a/u, the outer diameter will vary, making the diameter of the crimp ring an issue. Doing this is risky and may result in a non-fitting connector. I would use an adapter, which will always work. 4. Are there crimp on PL-259 connectors? Also probably, but again, methinks you're better off with an F connector and an adapter. [1] I just counted 7 assorted coaxial cables going between my roof and various RF devices in my house. All but one are 75 ohm RG-6a/u. Some are double shielded, while others are quad shielded. The connectors are slightly different. All the HF and VHF/UHF antennas use 75 ohm coax. The one 50 ohm LMR-400 run is for the 900MHz antenna. -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jeff Liebermann wrote:
Hopefully, it was a "push-on" tool and connector http://www.arrisistore.com/digicon/Digicon-F-Connector-Installation-Guide.pdf not the piece of junk with the small crimped ring. Thanks, Yes, but mine looks more like a nut cracker, however it works the same way. Be thankful. I find them to be a necessary evil as most ham radios require them. Meanwhile, commercial radios are moving away from UHF and toward other connectors, such as Type-N, BNC, TNC, Mini-UHF, and SMA. However, Comerica base antennas remain UHF or Type-N. Me too. Since all of the ham radios I have were either brought from the US in 1996 when I moved here, or even older ones brought here, they use Pl-259's or in one case an RCA jack (Drake SP-R4) for the antenna. TV sets still use the Belling-Lee plugs (called PAL connectors in the US) and so do VCRs. Everything else uses F connectors (cable TV, Satellite TV) although RF outputs to TV sets have gone the way of the VCR. DVB is just starting here and the tuners use Belling-Lee connectors. F to Belling-Lee adaptors are common here, and even in the US, where Radio Shack sells them. That's what I do. Most of my cables are NOT terminated with UHF connectors. If I need to go to UHF, I use an adapter. They are also hard to get and expensive. Yes, they work. I use quite a bit of RG-6a/u and prefer to have everything terminated by the same connector, which is the CATV standard F connector. If I need BNC, I use an adapter. OK, So where do you get your adaptors? Agreed. The good ones are "push on" F connectors. I gave up about 10 years ago and used the cheap screw on ones because they gave me a better fit than the crimp "around" types. The push on ones are a lot better. There are such things as real 75 ohm BNC plugs and jacks. They're easy to recognize because they lack the PTFE dielectric. The 75 ohm connectors will mate properly with the 50 ohm connectors. There is little risk of VSWR problems from using 50 ohm connectors on RG-6a/u. ok. http://www.qsl.net/n9zia/wireless/75_ohm_hardline.html Basically, any small loss from VSWR is compensated by the lower loss per meter of RG-6a/u as compared to RG-58a/u. Methinks you're safe using all 50 ohm connectors.[1] Good, thanks. [1] I just counted 7 assorted coaxial cables going between my roof and various RF devices in my house. All but one are 75 ohm RG-6a/u. Some are double shielded, while others are quad shielded. The connectors are slightly different. All the HF and VHF/UHF antennas use 75 ohm coax. The one 50 ohm LMR-400 run is for the 900MHz antenna. That's not an issue, 900mHz is not a ham band here, and 1.gHz too short range to consider using. I think there is one 1.2gHz repeater in the country, and I can't hit the co-located 2m repeater anyway. Geoff. -- Geoffrey S. Mendelson, Jerusalem, Israel N3OWJ/4X1GM New word I coined 12/13/09, "Sub-Wikipedia" adj, describing knowledge or understanding, as in he has a sub-wikipedia understanding of the situation. i.e possessing less facts or information than can be found in the Wikipedia. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 6 Jun 2010 01:19:04 +0000 (UTC), "Geoffrey S. Mendelson"
wrote: That's what I do. Most of my cables are NOT terminated with UHF connectors. If I need to go to UHF, I use an adapter. They are also hard to get and expensive. My guess(tm) is that they are less expensive than oddities such as an N-connector for RG-6a/u. They also have the advantage of being reusable. When you destroy your coax cable, just unscrew the adapters and use a new F connector. I sometimes have to make my own adapters. It's not because the adapter is unavailable or hard to find. It's because the accumulated length of the connectors and adapters can get quite long. There are also mechanical considerations, where an N to SMA adapter will surely break at the SMA when the heavy cable is bent. For SMA and Mini-UHF adapters, I sometimes use short pigtails to act as a strain relief. OK, So where do you get your adaptors? It varies. Once a year, I got to one local hamfest and stock up. I like to see the connectors to make sure they're not junk. I typically buy about $150 worth every year. Much of it disappears during Field Day. The problem is that most of this stuff is nickel plated. Nickel is fine for systems which are not potentially affected by intermodulation issues. Therefore, I'll use them at home, Field Day, other hams stations, and my mobile. I won't use them for repeaters, mountain top sites, and microwave links. http://www.amphenolrf.com/simple/PIM%20Paper.pdf http://www.repeater-builder.com/antenna/pdf/andrew-braid-over-foil-imd.pdf http://www.repeater-builder.com/antenna/pdf/recommended-coax-and-connectors-for-iden.pdf For repeaters, I use silver plated connectors, when I can get them. Gold plating is an option, but under the gold is a layer of nickel, which worries me a little (most of the RF flows on the surface). Tin plate also works. I buy most of my connectors from RF Industries: http://www.rfcoaxconnectors.com Their mix is really bizarre. They offer Nickel, Tin, Silver and Gold plating, but not in every type of connector. For example, F adapters are available only in Nickel or Gold, while UHF connector are only available in Nickel and Silver. Trying to avoid dissimilar metals is difficult. Other sources are eBay, various online dealers, the local electronics sto http://www.santacruzelectronics.com the local cable company, and the local DTV satellite installation company. The latter are my best sources of RG-6a/u and F connectors. I once obtained a free bucket full of filthy connectors that someone had left in the rain. Rather than clean them, they went to me, instead of the recyclers. There were literally hundreds of F connectors in the bucket. If you're working on the HF and VHF bands, you can probably just solder two connectors together to make an adapter. I have a bunch of BNC to UHF adapter I made this way. The BNC panel jack fits nicely into the PL-259 connector. The losses are not signifigant, even at microwave (2.4GHz) frequencies: http://802.11junk.com/jeffl/antennas/connector-loss/ I've done 8 ft chains of adapters with similar results. I don't know what to suggest. It sounds like getting someone in Europe to throw together a collection of connectors for you seems easier than importing them one at a time. -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jeff Liebermann wrote:
My guess(tm) is that they are less expensive than oddities such as an N-connector for RG-6a/u. They also have the advantage of being reusable. When you destroy your coax cable, just unscrew the adapters and use a new F connector. I don't know. I've never seen them. OK, So where do you get your adaptors? It varies. Once a year, I got to one local hamfest and stock up. What's a hamfest? There are none here. http://www.rfcoaxconnectors.com I'll check them out. Their mix is really bizarre. They offer Nickel, Tin, Silver and Gold plating, but not in every type of connector. For example, F adapters are available only in Nickel or Gold, while UHF connector are only available in Nickel and Silver. Trying to avoid dissimilar metals is difficult. It's less important here. It rains about 14 days a year spread over 6 months. It rained for about 10 minutes in April, has looked like, but did not rain at all in May, and won't do it again until around November 1. http://www.santacruzelectronics.com I'll look at them too. I don't know what to suggest. It sounds like getting someone in Europe to throw together a collection of connectors for you seems easier than importing them one at a time. Actually that's a myth. While I am geographicaly closer, postage from the US is much cheaper than Europe. The only way shipping becomes cheaper if I were to load a container full on a ship. Then sending it from a Mediterranean port would be cheaper. Sending a single package from the US is cheaper and faster than anywhere else in the world with the usual, but not always exception of elsewhere in Israel. A single envelope, even one containing electronic components takes a week from a vendor to my door. A small box takes 2-3 and I have to go pick it up at the post office, even if they are the same cost and weight. The same with internet access, I can download files from the US at twice the speed from the UK, and 4-5 times that from continental Europe. Geoff. -- Geoffrey S. Mendelson, Jerusalem, Israel N3OWJ/4X1GM New word I coined 12/13/09, "Sub-Wikipedia" adj, describing knowledge or understanding, as in he has a sub-wikipedia understanding of the situation. i.e possessing less facts or information than can be found in the Wikipedia. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Mixing high side versus low side and (f1 - f2) versus (f1 + f2) | Homebrew | |||
796 versus 780 | Scanner | |||
IC-735 versus IC-726 | Dx | |||
IC-735 versus IC-726 | Dx | |||
ic-735 versus ic-726 | General |