On Aug 28, 6:06*pm, Art Unwin wrote:
One of the most perplexing aurguements in the history of Physics is
the supposed existence of the *Aether. Or in other words
Aether is has to be considered as a media.
In radio terms it can be stated that communication can be carried by a
surface wave only if it travels along the line of different media
which in physics is unshakable. Thus many physists argued that
air itself *must be considered as a medium in that surface radio waves
certainly exist and thus the case against the existance of an Aether
has not yet been proven, as the question of the two mediums involved
have yet to be identified.
As I have stated earlier the expansion of the laws of static particles
show that particles from the Sun settle upon Earth's diamagnetic
surfaces. Thus providing the medium that purists have searched for
which now can replace the undeniable required presence of a medium
instead of the former "Aether". Classical physics of Newton, Einstein
and others had the answers all along with the Gaussian law of Statics!
Regards
Art
notion of an Aether.

geez, all this time to think of something interesting and all you can
come up with is an outdated aether argument crossed with your magical
levitating diamagnetic neutrinos??? you could at least have tried to
latch onto this one and do something more original:
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80...g-with-matter/