Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Gaussian patent
On 11/2/2010 3:06 PM, Art Unwin wrote:
On Nov 1, 10:21 pm, Art wrote: Before this thread gets out of line again let me make clear a couple of points that some have got hold of which has led them astray. First it is well known that Gauss was a part of the equations of maxwell with his contribution on magnetics I focussed on Gauss's contribution via statics using the boundary rules. It can be seen that applying a time varying current to a gaussian field is exactly the same as Maxwells first equation! Yes you have to convert from cgs units to show this but it clearly places particles as the root of radiation. The second point that some planted themselves on was that all elements were resonant and therefore all should be fed. The real point here is that all being resonant showed the presence of equilibrium which is a must in all equations. It also showed that with a minimum of two elements all radiation is accounted for where-as with the yagi which is not in equilibrium has losses because the last element added fails to recover remaining available radiation. This is not about getting a better antenna than a yagi since the latter utelizes available radiation with less waste than others. The patent is really about obtaining knowledge that fits the bill of Maxwell's first equation and points to the static particle accelerated into a charge by a time varying current. It also brings into question that put forward by the London brothers regarding cooper pairs as well as the relationship of a proton. It also makes clear that the double slot experiment is correct in stating that particles and waves have similar properties but makes very clear that the subject at hand is very much a particle. Thus the bottom line is that Gauss provided direction with respect to the static aproach AS WELL as the more well known magnetic connection. It is also important to state again the importance of maintaining equilibrium when persuing the laws of Maxwell. I would also like to add my assertion of just two vectors as the sole constituents of the standard model that Einstein earlier suspected. At the same time Maxwells law has not been fully satisfied as it has not removed the intrinsic resistance of the radiators because of the presence of skin effect and thus the magnetic field which has no contribution to the accountability of all forces. However it is important to note that in superconductors removal of the magnetic field achieves the desired action as would a Meander style radiator where in the absence of skin depth the current would rise to the surface thus eliminating resistance losses incurred by the radiator, which now can add to the desired maximum radiation efficiency by tackling the radiation resistance, that is the only resistance left. Thanks for your time Regards Art. Oh my. I have to catch my breath. It hurts to laugh that hard. "Darn" (censored), we are really going to miss you when you are finally put away for your own protection. No one, NO ONE! can blather nonsense like you. It is absolutely amazing. tom K0TAR |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
(OT) Inventing a Better Patent System | Antenna | |||
Interesting patent | Shortwave | |||
New patent application rules | Antenna | |||
Interesting patent | Antenna | |||
Patent regulations | Antenna |