Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 15 nov, 02:59, "amdx" wrote:
Hi Guys, *Assuming I have a tank circuit on a crystal radio with a Z at resonance of 1.5 megaohms. How would I make an antenna and extract maximum signal and keep the Z at 750,000 ohms. * If don't think that's what I want to do, tell me that too. :-) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *MikeK Hello Mike, Assuming you have a long wire outside and a ground provision, you may use an inductive coupling. By changing the distance between the antenna coil and the receiver coil, you modify the impedance transformation. Other method is capacitive coupling. Probably positioning the end of the antenna wire close to the high impedance side of the tank circuit will give the desired effect. Changing the distance changes the coupling. For inductive coupling, your receiver circuit can be floating, for capacitive coupling, the receiver should be grounded. By changing the coupling you can optimize for maximum selectivity (with reduced sensitivity) or maximum sensitivity (with reduces selectivity). Regarding the antenna, assuming LW and AM reception, long combined with high gives strongest signal, hence you can reduce the coupling to get best selectivity. Best regards, Wim PA3DJS www.tetech.nl without abc, PM will reach me very likely |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Wimpie" wrote in message ... On 15 nov, 02:59, "amdx" wrote: Hi Guys, Assuming I have a tank circuit on a crystal radio with a Z at resonance of 1.5 megaohms. How would I make an antenna and extract maximum signal and keep the Z at 750,000 ohms. If don't think that's what I want to do, tell me that too. :-) MikeK Hello Mike, Assuming you have a long wire outside and a ground provision, you may use an inductive coupling. By changing the distance between the antenna coil and the receiver coil, you modify the impedance transformation. Other method is capacitive coupling. Probably positioning the end of the antenna wire close to the high impedance side of the tank circuit will give the desired effect. Changing the distance changes the coupling. Wim PA3DJS www.tetech.nl without abc, PM will reach me very likely It seem a common method to couple the antenna is just a single series variable capacitor. I don't know if this method couples maximum energy to the radio. ?? Normally we transform our antenna to 50 ohms, in this case we would like to see 1 million ohms, I'm not sure that can be done, and if it can the losses may be higher than having a mismatch. Thanks, MikeK |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 15 nov, 16:23, "amdx" wrote:
"Wimpie" wrote in message .... On 15 nov, 02:59, "amdx" wrote: Hi Guys, Assuming I have a tank circuit on a crystal radio with a Z at resonance of 1.5 megaohms. How would I make an antenna and extract maximum signal and keep the Z at 750,000 ohms. If don't think that's what I want to do, tell me that too. :-) MikeK Hello Mike, Assuming you have a long wire outside and a ground provision, you may use an inductive coupling. *By changing the distance between the antenna coil and the receiver coil, you modify the impedance transformation. Other method is capacitive coupling. *Probably positioning the end of the antenna wire close to the high impedance side of the tank circuit will give the desired effect. Changing the distance changes the coupling. Wim PA3DJSwww.tetech.nl without abc, PM will reach me very likely *It seem a common method to couple the antenna is just a single series variable capacitor. I don't know if this method couples maximum energy to the radio. ?? Yes, with the correct value, it will. *Normally we transform our antenna to 50 ohms, in this case we would like to see 1 million ohms, I'm not sure that can be done, and if it can the losses may be higher than having a mismatch. * * * * * * * * * * * Thanks, MikeK Hello Mike, Regarding the 1M Ohm impedance. If you can make a tank circuit with 1MOhm impedance at resonance, you can transform your antenna impedance to that value. You use your resonant circuit as part of the impedance transformer. Even in case of a ohmic 50 Ohms antenna impedance, you can transform this to 1 Mohm (inductive or capacitive coupling). Maybe you have to combine the coupling capacitor with a tap on the coil. Regarding your detector. In the detector circuit you transform a high impedance (around 1 MOhm) to a lower impedance to find the sweet spot for your detector diode / LF load combination. If you have a simulator (for example SPICE type SW), you can model your antenna as a voltage source in series with a capacitance (pF range) and some resistance (1..100 Ohm range, depending on ground provision). By changing the coupling capacitance from the antenna to the top of your resonant circuit, you can see what happens (in an .AC sweep). You will see impedance transformation (that is more output voltage than input voltage) and of course some detuning of your circuit because of the additional capacitance. If you want to do some hand calculation, search for: L impedance transformation network. Best regards, Wim PA3DJS www.tetech.nl please remove abc first in case of PM |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 15, 1:26*am, Wimpie wrote:
On 15 nov, 02:59, "amdx" wrote: Hi Guys, *Assuming I have a tank circuit on a crystal radio with a Z at resonance of 1.5 megaohms. How would I make an antenna and extract maximum signal and keep the Z at 750,000 ohms. * If don't think that's what I want to do, tell me that too. :-) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *MikeK Hello Mike, Assuming you have a long wire outside and a ground provision, you may use an inductive coupling. *By changing the distance between the antenna coil and the receiver coil, you modify the impedance transformation. Other method is capacitive coupling. *Probably positioning the end of the antenna wire close to the high impedance side of the tank circuit will give the desired effect. Changing the distance changes the coupling. For inductive coupling, your receiver circuit can be floating, for capacitive coupling, the receiver should be grounded. By changing the coupling you can optimize for maximum selectivity (with reduced sensitivity) or maximum sensitivity (with reduces selectivity). Regarding the antenna, assuming LW and AM reception, long combined with high gives strongest signal, hence you can reduce the coupling to get best selectivity. Best regards, Wim PA3DJSwww.tetech.nl without abc, PM will reach me very likely I like your very practical advice here, Wim. For Mike, as Wim noted in another post, you can simulate this in Spice quite easily. While you're playing with it in Spice, you might also look at two high-Q tanks, tuned to the same frequency, with a non-zero coupling coefficient between the inductors. Excite the first with a voltage generator in series with the RLC tank, or a current source across it, and observe the frequency response at the second tank. Vary the coefficient of coupling between the coils and notice how small it is to get critical coupling. If you use LTSpice, you can use a .step statement to run a set of simulations over a range of k values, for example. The flip side of this is that in LC filters that are very narrow-band that you design assuming no coupling among the resonators, expect to have to work some to insure that there really is no coupling among them in your implementation! Sometimes it gets difficult to shield well enough between adjacent resonators to get the performance you want. Cheers, Tom |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Connect a 500 Ohm Antenna using Matching Transformer {Balun} ? -or- Antenna Pre-Selector ? | Shortwave | |||
Matching to Crystal Filter | Homebrew | |||
Crystal Filter Matching | Homebrew | |||
Building a Matching Transformer for Shortwave Listener's Antenna using a Binocular Ferrite Core from a TV type Matching Transformer | Shortwave | |||
Antenna matching | Shortwave |