Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob wrote:
Hi Steven Thank you for your response to my problem. Any suggestion? What you say is that I would be better off without that 1:1 balun? Yes, now I have it at 66feet each leg for a total of 132 feet but now it is not at the best height but kinda sagging and lopping where it is but off the ground and about 2 feet above the roof and other obstacles. I also have it presently close to steel guy wires and the tower itself. What would be my problem then here now? The problem is the coax. You believe it is my balun? I was hoping to get this up there and then leave it. All this climbing is difficult. Do you believe that once I get it up there, with the coax, with the dipole, no balun, do you think that would allow me better results with a good antenna tuner? Any advice is greatly appreciated. Feeding your dipole with ladder-line moves all the matching problems to the hamshack where you don't have to climb anything to solve them. Try the following configuration and get back to us on any remaining problems. XMTR--tuner--1:1 balun/choke--100 ft. 450 ohm ladder-line---132 ft. dipole This configuration will allow multi-band operation on most of the HF ham bands. The problems you will have with a couple of bands are solvable. -- 73, Cecil, W5DXP -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
40 meter dipole or 88 feet doublet | Antenna | |||
Dipole Next To Home-Is That A Problem?? | Antenna | |||
shortened dipole loaded | Antenna | |||
10m dipole and tuner | Antenna |