Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 09:53:41 +0100, Szczepan Bialek rearranged some
electrons to say: It is interesting that Roemer has measured 220 000 km/s. S* Why is that interesting? He was wrong. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Velocity is delta-length divided by delta-time. The length of a meter
depends upon the velocity and orientation of the meter stick. The length of a second depends upon the velocity of the clock. Are we sure that the velocity of light is a *universal* constant or is it just a conceptual stake in the ground to try to keep everything in the universe from being relative to something else? -- 73, Cecil, w5dxp.com |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() " napisał w wiadomości ... On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 09:53:41 +0100, Szczepan Bialek rearranged some electrons to say: It is interesting that Roemer has measured 220 000 km/s. S* Why is that interesting? He was wrong. From the same data Newton calculated 310 000 km/s. But it was for the Earth the Sun (the hottest region). Roemer's method measures speeds of light in different regions of the Solar System. Cecil wrote: "Are we sure that the velocity of light is a ". "c" is the *universal* constant in EM (calculating factors between different units). "velocity of light" is the medium and temperature dependent. S* |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Szczepan Bialek wrote:
" napisa? w wiadomo?ci ... On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 09:53:41 +0100, Szczepan Bialek rearranged some electrons to say: It is interesting that Roemer has measured 220 000 km/s. S* Why is that interesting? He was wrong. From the same data Newton calculated 310 000 km/s. But it was for the Earth the Sun (the hottest region). Newton died almost 300 years ago and we have much better data since then, you babbling idiot. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Użytkownik napisał w wiadomości ... Szczepan Bialek wrote: " napisa? w wiadomo?ci ... On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 09:53:41 +0100, Szczepan Bialek rearranged some electrons to say: It is interesting that Roemer has measured 220 000 km/s. S* Why is that interesting? He was wrong. From the same data Newton calculated 310 000 km/s. But it was for the Earth the Sun (the hottest region). Newton died almost 300 years ago and we have much better data since then, you babbling idiot. You have? Where I can find them? S* -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Szczepan Bialek wrote:
U?ytkownik napisa? w wiadomo?ci ... Szczepan Bialek wrote: " napisa? w wiadomo?ci ... On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 09:53:41 +0100, Szczepan Bialek rearranged some electrons to say: It is interesting that Roemer has measured 220 000 km/s. S* Why is that interesting? He was wrong. From the same data Newton calculated 310 000 km/s. But it was for the Earth the Sun (the hottest region). Newton died almost 300 years ago and we have much better data since then, you babbling idiot. You have? Where I can find them? S* In stuff written recently, you babbling moron. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Which is faster, text or Morse Code? | Shortwave | |||
Light, waves or particles | Antenna | |||
Radio Waves help!! | Antenna | |||
Announcement - The Radio-Mart Red Drap Is Now Second Rate - We Now Have Blue-Sky-Radio's Blue-Green Drap Fading . . . Into The Bright-White-Light ! {Come Into The Light !} | Shortwave | |||
Traveling Waves, Power Waves,..., Any Waves,... | Antenna |