Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old March 20th 11, 08:38 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Dec 2010
Posts: 54
Default Skin effect question

On 3/20/2011 3:09 PM, JIMMIE wrote:
On Mar 19, 5:59 pm, wrote:
On 19 mar, 22:25, wrote:

I was palnning on building a 2M Yagi this weekend and was wondering if
my available bill of materials would have a significant effect on
normal design parameters. The plan is to use 3/4 inch EMT conduit for
the boom and 3/8 inch all-thread for the elements. My concern was that
the threads could change the design frequency.


JImmie


Hello Jimmie,

I think it will be OK, but if you want to be 100% sure, make a dipole
of same thickness tubing and one from the threaded material of choice.
If results are same, you can use it without dimension scaling. Are
you using galvanized or alu material?

If required, apply some corrosion protection.

With kind regards,

Wim
PA3DJSwww.tetech.nl
.


Galvanized, The pupose was to demostrate that materials can often be
adlib and still have a useable antenna. Maybe this one will not last
30 years before it corrodes away but probably 5 or 6. Also I want to
demonstrate the value of using a jig when building many antennas all
made the same. I have tried the test you mention on 10 meters before
replacing a vertical mounted on my truck. Changing materials didn't
seem to make much difference. WIll try the same for 2M but I dont
have an SWR meter for 2M at this time.. Was hopng someone in the group
might think this interesing enough to try.


Jimmie


I made a j-pole from galvanized steel. It worked beautifully. When I
replaced it with a commercial antenna I notice very little change in
performance and signal strength. I had hoped my kluge was deficient in
performance compared to the commercial antenna. Didn't seem so. My QTH
was way out in the country side about 20 miles from the nearest repeater.

Just a story for you, no hard data. Sorry.

John
  #2   Report Post  
Old March 20th 11, 10:14 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 702
Default Skin effect question


"John - KD5YI" wrote in message
...
I made a j-pole from galvanized steel. It worked beautifully. When I
replaced it with a commercial antenna I notice very little change in
performance and signal strength. I had hoped my kluge was deficient in
performance compared to the commercial antenna. Didn't seem so. My QTH was
way out in the country side about 20 miles from the nearest repeater.

Just a story for you, no hard data. Sorry.

John


Unless you can tell the differance in a few tenths of a dB, almost any
conductive material will work for simple antennas if the diameter is large
in terms of a wavelength. If the antenna is built the same or vary similar
to a comercial antenna, you usually don't notice any differance.

Lots of money is spent on the comercial stuff for little or no improvement.
Problem for many is buying the materials. If you only need a small ammount
of material , you often have to buy a lot.
Then not everyone has the machinery to do the building.




  #3   Report Post  
Old March 20th 11, 11:38 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Dec 2010
Posts: 54
Default Skin effect question

On 3/20/2011 5:14 PM, Ralph Mowery wrote:
"John - wrote in message
...
I made a j-pole from galvanized steel. It worked beautifully. When I
replaced it with a commercial antenna I notice very little change in
performance and signal strength. I had hoped my kluge was deficient in
performance compared to the commercial antenna. Didn't seem so. My QTH was
way out in the country side about 20 miles from the nearest repeater.

Just a story for you, no hard data. Sorry.

John


Unless you can tell the differance in a few tenths of a dB, almost any
conductive material will work for simple antennas if the diameter is large
in terms of a wavelength. If the antenna is built the same or vary similar
to a comercial antenna, you usually don't notice any differance.


Of course. My response is aimed at the OP's subject line. I'm trying to
be encouraging.

Lots of money is spent on the comercial stuff for little or no improvement.
Problem for many is buying the materials. If you only need a small ammount
of material , you often have to buy a lot.
Then not everyone has the machinery to do the building.


I bought a long piece of chain link fence top rail for the mast and a
piece of conduit for the 1/4 wave element. I used a hacksaw and a drill
to do the machining. I used automobile hose clamps to connect the
transmission line to the kluge. It worked well for about 10 years until
high winds bent the mast (chain link fence top rail is not that stiff).




Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Serious Skin Care Tips For Women Who Take Their Skin Care Seriously! [email protected] Antenna 1 May 22nd 08 04:02 PM
End effect, velocity propagation question Tac Antenna 3 May 25th 04 10:00 PM
skin effect Alfred Lorona Antenna 9 August 21st 03 09:09 PM
skin effect Alfred Lorona Antenna 0 August 13th 03 05:15 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:22 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017