Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sure, a tree cannot be a good antenna. Any "real" antenna will probably
always be better. But often the question is: no antenna at all or anything which does not seem to be an antenna. Perhaps a tree can be such a thing. Further, in portable operation, it is not always easy to install a "real" antenna. Claude Trees are, as already noted, usable as VHF antennas when properly 'fed'...whether you should or shouldn't use a tree is your decision. It is hardly a new idea. Certainly placing a bona fide VHF antenna--in the clear--on top of the tree is the better of the two options. The interesting question is: how does a tree compare to a ground-based monopole? There is a reason why VHF monopole antennas are not on the ground, whereas MF ones are. Experiment for more info. Many have been down this path before. I don't know a sap or a chump in the bunch. 73, Chip N1IR |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Mobile Ant L match ? | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna |