Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "W5DXP" napisal w wiadomosci ... On Sunday, July 22, 2012 11:20:15 AM UTC-5, Szczepan Bialek wrote: Is it proved? Yes, proved to be pure fantasy. The Standard Model is as close to reality as we have gotten so far. The modern-day atom smashers have proved just how ignorant the speculations of the earlier physicists really were. "8 Polarization 319" Could you look at this? In my 4th edition, Chapter 8 starts on page 325. The first sentence says: "... light may be treated as a transverse electromagnetic wave." Nowhere does it say that light may be treated as a longitudinal wave. "" In 1817, Young had proposed a small transverse component to light, while yet retaining a far larger longitudinal component. Fresnel, by the year 1821, was able to show via mathematical methods that polarization could be explained only if light was entirely transverse, with no longitudinal vibration whatsoever. From: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fresnel As you see the Fresnel model is simpler than Young. In the texbooks are only simple things. The Authors MAY know that. So they wrote: "light may be treated". MAY instead "Without of any doubts". S* -- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Using speaker wire for a dipole | Antenna | |||
80m Dipole fed with open wire feeder. | Antenna | |||
Newbie with a wire dipole | CB | |||
Receiver dipole vs 23 ft wire for HF | Antenna | |||
Long wire vs. G5RV/dipole | Shortwave |