Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Rob" napisa³ w wiadomo¶ci ... Szczepan Bialek wrote: The oscillatory flow of electrons is inherently not symmetric. You keep claiming that. But you don't explain why there is no nonlinearity in the antenna. When the antenna is nonlinear, as you claim, there must be intermodulation in the antenna. But in a well constructed antenna, there is no intermodulation. So there is no unsymmetric flow of electrons. I don't care what people have written in the 19th century. Please stop bringing that up. I am only interested in how things are explained today. Everything was discovered in XIX (for the radio): "The electrical waves produced by the oscillations at A traveled along the wires and were reflected at the far ends. Lodge knew that the longer spark at B3 was due to what he called the "recoil impulse" or "recoil kick" at the end of the wires where the waves were reflected.[4] At spark gap B3 both the incident wave and the reflected wave had their maximum values and were in phase. This produced a voltage twice as large as the voltage at spark gap A. From: http://www.antiquewireless.org/otb/lodge1102.htm Is it still true? If yes, than you must admit that the leakage must be stronger at "recoil kick" when the voltage is doubled. "So there is the unsymmetrical flow of electrons." Do you agree? S* |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Using speaker wire for a dipole | Antenna | |||
80m Dipole fed with open wire feeder. | Antenna | |||
Newbie with a wire dipole | CB | |||
Receiver dipole vs 23 ft wire for HF | Antenna | |||
Long wire vs. G5RV/dipole | Shortwave |