Szczepan Bialek wrote:

"W5DXP" napisal w wiadomosci
...
On Friday, July 27, 2012 11:57:54 AM UTC-5, Szczepan Bialek wrote:
Why you do not like the electrons?

I don't dislike electrons and have a bunch of them in my body. Without free
electrons, antennas wouldn't be able to radiate photons.

For what you need the next " the equivalent of current flow".

Technically, current is defined as the movement of charged particles. Since
photons don't carry an electric charge, they technically don't meet the
definition. But since current flow implies energy transfer and photons are
capable of energy transfer, one can come up with the concept of "equivalent
current" corresponding to photon movement. Thus the "current flow" through
a capacitor is explained by photon flow rather than displacement current.

"Energy transfer": "Umov was the first who introduced in physics such basic
concepts as speed and direction of movement of energy,".
" In his first works of this period, Umov considered potential energy as
kinetic energy of some environments "imperceptible for us"."
From: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikolay_Umov

And he was essentially wrong in the details as were most of the early
physicists.

Photons as the wave packet transfer the energy in the same way as the sound
waves.

No, it is not.

In radars are "pulses".

There is such a thing as CW radar which is not pulses, so you are wrong
yet again.

Light is not coherent.

Whether or not light is coherent depends on the source of the light;
sunlight and candles are not coherent but lasars are coherent.

It consists of pulses or
photons.

A pulse and and photon are two entirely different things.

Light may or may not be pulsed, but it is always photons.

The same is in sonars.

No, sonar is like radar only in very general terms.

For what you need the new "photons".

For what you need a new brain because the one you have doesn't work.

You are an ignorant, babbling, ineducable idiot who knows absolutely
NOTHING about how anything works.