Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/23/2012 4:03 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jul 2012 12:41:32 -0500, John S wrote: From the document you posted, P*G/(4*Pi*D^2) = E^2/(120*Pi) Let G = 1, D = 3, E = 200uV then P*1/(4*3.14*3*3) = (200e-6)^2/377 and P/113 = 40e-9/377 so that P = 113 * 106e-12 giving P = 12e-9 This looks like NANOwatts to me. Well, that looks right. I'll do the short version: From Pg 29. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/bulletins/oet63/oet63rev.pdf Assuming a 0dBi gain antenna: Power = 0.3 FS^2 where FS = field strength in Volts/meter P = Watts Plugging in: Power = 0.3 * (200 uV/m)^2 = 0.3 * (200*10^-6 V/m)^2 Power = 0.3 * 4*10^-8 = 12*10-9 = 12 nano watts. Argh... You're right. However, that can't be the correct maximum power. It's much too low to be useful. Digging out a cheat sheet from: http://www.ti.com/lit/an/swra090/swra090.pdf CEPT (European) 1e and 1e1 are 10mw and 1mw respectively. However, digging down to the FCC stuff on Pg 11, I find that the specs are really in FCC 15.231(b). http://louise.hallikainen.org/FCC/FccRules/2012/15/231/ and are approx 11,000 uV/meter. Grinding the numbers again... Assuming a 0dBi gain antenna: Power = 0.3 FS^2 where FS = field strength in Volts/meter P = Watts Plugging in: Power = 0.3 * (11000 uV/m)^2 = 0.3 * (11000*10^-6 V/m)^2 Power = 0.3 * 0.000121 = 36 milliwatts. ..3 * .000121 = .000036 or 36 MICROwatts. Thanks for catching my mistake and I'll double check the numbers (again) when I get home from some service calls. You're welcome again. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
433MHz or 916MHz ? | Homebrew | |||
433MHz or 916MHz ? | Homebrew | |||
433MHz tracker | Homebrew | |||
Filter - 433MHz | Equipment | |||
Filter - 433MHz | Equipment |