Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Jim Kelley wrote:
I've never disputed the solutions produce the same number. I disputed the validity of the approach you took to arrive at the equation. I guess I owe the group an apology. The guys over on sci.physics.electromag are inferring things that I never meant to imply. I thought the meaning of my words was clear but I guess that's not the case. I apologize to anyone I accused of deliberately misinterpreting what I said. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =----- |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Cecil's Math a Blunder? | Antenna | |||
Cecil's Math | Antenna |