Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Kelley wrote:
W5DXP wrote: The 33.33W that makes a round trip to the impedance discontinuity and back to the load is not the same 33.33W that is reflected by the load. TV ghosting proves that to be true. TV ghosting is primarily the result of multipathing, which is external to the antenna system. :-) I'm talking about TV ghosting due to reflections on the transmission line between a TV test generator and a TV receiver. The only "multipathing" involved is the different paths taken by the reflected waves inside the transmission line. The only voltage phase reversal in the given example is in the re-reflected wave associated with the 8.33W. How are you determining your phase reversals? Don't forget that phase reversal on reflection occurs when a wave encounters a more dense medium (or a higher impedance). Nope, a voltage phase reversal occurs when a wave encounters a *lower* impedance. A voltage wave encountering a higher impedance does not reverse phase. In the earlier example, the only lower impedance encountered is by the rearward-traveling wave flowing back into the impedance discontinuity. I repeat, Vref2(-rho) is the only voltage phase reversal. -- 73, Cecil, W5DXP |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Cecil's Math a Blunder? | Antenna | |||
Cecil's Math | Antenna |