Szczepan Bialek wrote:

"Wayne" napisal w wiadomosci
...


snip

How does that configuration of a monopole with one radial differ from a
dipole?

The true horizontal dipole (electrically symmetric) radiate in one direction
only. A monopole in all directions.

A dipole radiates in two directions, idiot.

So a half wave wire broken at the center is a monopole with a single
radial if it is fed directly with coax?

Yes. The one leg is the radiator and the second is a ground (like a
satellite chassis).

Absurd nonsense.

And it is a dipole if it has a balanced feed?

The true dipole is electrically symmetric. The same voltages but in the
opposite phase.
Thank this the interference take place and a dipole has the main lobe and
many side lobes.
With the monopole no lobes.

Babbling gibberish as usual.

What if the coax feedline has a quarter wave sleeve, open at the antenna
but connected to the coax at the other end?
Is it a monopole or a dipole?

"Marconi, who discovered if he attached one terminal of his transmitter to a
wire suspended in the air and the other to the Earth, he could transmit for
longer distances".

This has nothing to do with the question asked.

You haven't the slightest clue what a quarter wave sleeve is or what it
does.


As you know are many version of ground because the soil is not the best.
The sleeve, the braid of the coax and so on are only the better ground.

Utter nonsense.

Dipole must be electrically symmetric.
If one leg is connected to the any version of ground such "dipole" radiate
as monopole.

More babble.

You truely are an idiot.


--
Jim Pennino