On Monday, April 24, 2017 at 1:46:08 PM UTC-4, wrote:
rickman wrote:
On 4/23/2017 9:06 PM, wrote:

Why you are trying to start an arguement over this simple fact is irrelevant
to me.

It takes two to tango.

And apparently sometimes three.

--
Jim Pennino

See? Unable to play nice...

On Monday, April 24, 2017 at 1:46:07 PM UTC-4, wrote:
wrote:
On Sunday, April 23, 2017 at 9:16:13 PM UTC-4, wrote:
wrote:
On Sunday, April 23, 2017 at 7:20:38 PM UTC-4, wrote:
On Sunday, April 23, 2017 at 7:16:03 PM UTC-4, wrote:
wrote:
On Sunday, April 23, 2017 at 6:16:03 PM UTC-4, wrote:
wrote:

As for me, I have no complaints on 'time', such as Jim points out.

Point totally and utterly missed; the older the post the less likely the
original poster is still around and this is particularly true for very
low volume groups like this one.

Responding to very old posts seems to be a trait of clueless goggle groups
users as real news readers will expire old posts so they aren't seen.

--
Jim Pennino

If I'm clueless, Jim, then the whole world is in one sorry shape.

What you really mean is that most of those unsavory posters are dead.

No, I meant exactly what I said.

snip remaining self-aggrandizing babble


--
Jim Pennino
I am confident that you mean what you say. Its your caibration to reality on this matter that is lacking, IMO.

But...some oldsters are challenged in that regard. Its important that future readers understand the demographic.

How old are you, Jim?

Never mind. My data base easily dug you out, along with the plane and all kinds of other info. Interesting.

So you are an emotionally immature stalker who thinks they become
empowered by doing web searches looking for personal information on
others; hardly surprising.

snip remaining babble


--
Jim Pennino

Of course the most interesting thing, Jim Pennino,WB6DKH,

The interesting thing is that this child thinks he needs bloviate
ad nauseam simply because it was pointed out to him that responding to
old USENET posts is not a good idea.

snip pointless verbal spew



--
Jim Pennino

See? Unable to play nice.

On Monday, April 24, 2017 at 1:46:06 PM UTC-4, wrote:
wrote:
On Sunday, April 23, 2017 at 9:16:13 PM UTC-4, wrote:
wrote:
On Sunday, April 23, 2017 at 7:20:38 PM UTC-4, wrote:
On Sunday, April 23, 2017 at 7:16:03 PM UTC-4, wrote:
wrote:
On Sunday, April 23, 2017 at 6:16:03 PM UTC-4, wrote:
wrote:

As for me, I have no complaints on 'time', such as Jim points out.

Point totally and utterly missed; the older the post the less likely the
original poster is still around and this is particularly true for very
low volume groups like this one.

Responding to very old posts seems to be a trait of clueless goggle groups
users as real news readers will expire old posts so they aren't seen.

--
Jim Pennino

If I'm clueless, Jim, then the whole world is in one sorry shape.

What you really mean is that most of those unsavory posters are dead.

No, I meant exactly what I said.

snip remaining self-aggrandizing babble


--
Jim Pennino
I am confident that you mean what you say. Its your caibration to reality on this matter that is lacking, IMO.

But...some oldsters are challenged in that regard. Its important that future readers understand the demographic.

How old are you, Jim?

Never mind. My data base easily dug you out, along with the plane and all kinds of other info. Interesting.

So you are an emotionally immature stalker who thinks they become
empowered by doing web searches looking for personal information on
others; hardly surprising.

snip remaining babble


--
Jim Pennino

Go drink your prune juice, dear.

Grow up child.


--
Jim Pennino

See? Unable to play nice.

On 4/24/2017 2:27 PM, wrote:
On Monday, April 24, 2017 at 1:46:06 PM UTC-4, wrote:
wrote:
On Sunday, April 23, 2017 at 9:16:13 PM UTC-4, wrote:
wrote:
On Sunday, April 23, 2017 at 7:20:38 PM UTC-4, wrote:
On Sunday, April 23, 2017 at 7:16:03 PM UTC-4, wrote:
wrote:
On Sunday, April 23, 2017 at 6:16:03 PM UTC-4, wrote:
wrote:

As for me, I have no complaints on 'time', such as Jim points out.

Point totally and utterly missed; the older the post the less likely the
original poster is still around and this is particularly true for very
low volume groups like this one.

Responding to very old posts seems to be a trait of clueless goggle groups
users as real news readers will expire old posts so they aren't seen.

--
Jim Pennino

If I'm clueless, Jim, then the whole world is in one sorry shape.

What you really mean is that most of those unsavory posters are dead.

No, I meant exactly what I said.

snip remaining self-aggrandizing babble


--
Jim Pennino
I am confident that you mean what you say. Its your caibration to reality on this matter that is lacking, IMO.

But...some oldsters are challenged in that regard. Its important that future readers understand the demographic.

How old are you, Jim?

Never mind. My data base easily dug you out, along with the plane and all kinds of other info. Interesting.

So you are an emotionally immature stalker who thinks they become
empowered by doing web searches looking for personal information on
others; hardly surprising.

snip remaining babble


--
Jim Pennino

Go drink your prune juice, dear.

Grow up child.


--
Jim Pennino

See? Unable to play nice.

LOL! Pot vs. Kettle

--

Rick C

On Monday, April 24, 2017 at 1:46:06 PM UTC-4, wrote:
wrote:
On Sunday, April 23, 2017 at 9:16:13 PM UTC-4, wrote:
wrote:
On Sunday, April 23, 2017 at 7:20:38 PM UTC-4, wrote:
On Sunday, April 23, 2017 at 7:16:03 PM UTC-4, wrote:
wrote:
On Sunday, April 23, 2017 at 6:16:03 PM UTC-4, wrote:
wrote:

As for me, I have no complaints on 'time', such as Jim points out.

Point totally and utterly missed; the older the post the less likely the
original poster is still around and this is particularly true for very
low volume groups like this one.

Responding to very old posts seems to be a trait of clueless goggle groups
users as real news readers will expire old posts so they aren't seen.

--
Jim Pennino

If I'm clueless, Jim, then the whole world is in one sorry shape.

What you really mean is that most of those unsavory posters are dead.

No, I meant exactly what I said.

snip remaining self-aggrandizing babble


--
Jim Pennino
I am confident that you mean what you say. Its your caibration to reality on this matter that is lacking, IMO.

But...some oldsters are challenged in that regard. Its important that future readers understand the demographic.

How old are you, Jim?

Never mind. My data base easily dug you out, along with the plane and all kinds of other info. Interesting.

So you are an emotionally immature stalker who thinks they become
empowered by doing web searches looking for personal information on
others; hardly surprising.

snip remaining babble


--
Jim Pennino

Go drink your prune juice, dear.

Grow up child.


--
Jim Pennino

See? Unable to play nice.

On 4/23/2017 3:49 PM, wrote:
On Sunday, April 23, 2017 at 3:25:07 PM UTC-4, rickman wrote:
On 4/23/2017 3:00 PM, wrote:
On Sunday, April 23, 2017 at 1:46:05 PM UTC-4, wrote:
wrote:
On Wednesday, March 1, 2017 at 12:31:10 AM UTC-5, wrote:
wrote:
On Monday, August 5, 2013 at 12:52:47 PM UTC-4, amdx wrote:
This newsgroup is very slow.
I remember fondly when Chip was here taking a beating
here for discussing his Fractal Antenna.
At least there was some enthusiasm shown.
Mikek

Well Mike, I certainly don't hang around people whose idea of a good time is to pull the feathers off a live eagle.

Sory to be 'so slow'; lotsa cool fractal antenna action. Its good to be da king!

You are responding to something that is nearly 4 years old.


--
Jim Pennino

Indeed.

Success has its compromises--like not having the time to respond to defamatory statements inveighed thru this 'news'group. You guys need to grow up and accept the fact that fractal antennas work as stated (by me) and are here to stay. This despite the bitterness of (some) bashing hams-- who (curiously!)died early; some of you call that the 'fractal curse'---- and others with nothing but time on their hands. I have a very good memory gentlemen; not all of you were so profoundly unkind, and I thank those few for their reasonable queries and responses. The rest of you got your own instant karma. IMO.

I am doing very FB. And enjoying myself immensely, but with a jam packed schedule. With no time for those who sit around trying to bash the already proven. Yawn.

Flower children grown thorns.

Jealous? Tuff:-)!

You are responding to something that is nearly 2 months old.

--
Jim Pennino

No Jim;

I am responding to a bunch of-- old men-- who thought it was cool to bash others. Now go play with your grandkids or dog. I am not fresh meat for bashing.

I'm not very good at remembering people in newsgroups, there is just a
printed name and some talk which is not enough to form much of an image
in my mind. I think I recall jim as being a real piece of work, but I'm
not certain I have the right guy. I want to say the person I recall
actually tried tracking down my history and claimed I wasn't a degreed
engineer. lol

People like that aren't even worth the response. I find it interesting
that so far he has only commented on the fact that you don't return to
the group very often. Nothing of value to say at all.

I don't think I've seen any of your fractal antenna work. I would be
interested. Is there a link?

--

Rick C
Well Rick,

Loss of memory is a common attribute of aging. I can't help you on that.

I can say that Jim's complaint of time--BTW call for Jim Pennino is WB6DKH--is also a common issue with aging.

What brought me back, Rick, was the ---admission of cruelty-- by one of your pals here on the 'news' group. And many of you looked back with nostalgic tears of 'beating'.

I just thought y'all like to know that I am so glad that I have been able to age so well, and watch those who dispense with cruelty age so poorly.

Not sure where you fall there Rick, so let's leave it at that. I wouldn't want the display of facts to be confused with cruelty.

As for me, I have no complaints on 'time', such as Jim points out. Time has been very good to me, for those who help themselves, and then help others.

So, to use the word of the hour, 'beat' that, OM.

Regards. Busy writing a patent and you guys have nothing to say, it would seem.


I hope you don't remember my as one that was cruel. I was always
hopeful that you had something new. And indeed you did.
I only posted because the group is so slow and when you were here, it
wasn't!
Now, if they could just prove LENR, I've been following that for 6
years, with little to show except a lot of big companies looking into it.
Mikek

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On Monday, April 24, 2017 at 2:29:44 PM UTC-4, rickman wrote:
On 4/24/2017 2:27 PM, wrote:
On Monday, April 24, 2017 at 1:46:06 PM UTC-4, wrote:
wrote:
On Sunday, April 23, 2017 at 9:16:13 PM UTC-4, wrote:
wrote:
On Sunday, April 23, 2017 at 7:20:38 PM UTC-4, wrote:
On Sunday, April 23, 2017 at 7:16:03 PM UTC-4, wrote:
wrote:
On Sunday, April 23, 2017 at 6:16:03 PM UTC-4, wrote:
wrote:

As for me, I have no complaints on 'time', such as Jim points out.

Point totally and utterly missed; the older the post the less likely the
original poster is still around and this is particularly true for very
low volume groups like this one.

Responding to very old posts seems to be a trait of clueless goggle groups
users as real news readers will expire old posts so they aren't seen.

--
Jim Pennino

If I'm clueless, Jim, then the whole world is in one sorry shape.

What you really mean is that most of those unsavory posters are dead.

No, I meant exactly what I said.

snip remaining self-aggrandizing babble


--
Jim Pennino
I am confident that you mean what you say. Its your caibration to reality on this matter that is lacking, IMO.

But...some oldsters are challenged in that regard. Its important that future readers understand the demographic.

How old are you, Jim?

Never mind. My data base easily dug you out, along with the plane and all kinds of other info. Interesting.

So you are an emotionally immature stalker who thinks they become
empowered by doing web searches looking for personal information on
others; hardly surprising.

snip remaining babble


--
Jim Pennino

Go drink your prune juice, dear.

Grow up child.


--
Jim Pennino

See? Unable to play nice.

LOL! Pot vs. Kettle

--

Rick C

LOL! Cyberbullies called out.

On 4/24/2017 12:37 PM, wrote:
wrote:
On Sunday, April 23, 2017 at 9:16:13 PM UTC-4, wrote:
wrote:
On Sunday, April 23, 2017 at 7:20:38 PM UTC-4, wrote:
On Sunday, April 23, 2017 at 7:16:03 PM UTC-4, wrote:
wrote:
On Sunday, April 23, 2017 at 6:16:03 PM UTC-4, wrote:
wrote:

As for me, I have no complaints on 'time', such as Jim points out.

Point totally and utterly missed; the older the post the less likely the
original poster is still around and this is particularly true for very
low volume groups like this one.

Responding to very old posts seems to be a trait of clueless goggle groups
users as real news readers will expire old posts so they aren't seen.

--
Jim Pennino

If I'm clueless, Jim, then the whole world is in one sorry shape.

What you really mean is that most of those unsavory posters are dead.

No, I meant exactly what I said.

snip remaining self-aggrandizing babble


--
Jim Pennino
I am confident that you mean what you say. Its your caibration to reality on this matter that is lacking, IMO.

But...some oldsters are challenged in that regard. Its important that future readers understand the demographic.

How old are you, Jim?

Never mind. My data base easily dug you out, along with the plane and all kinds of other info. Interesting.

So you are an emotionally immature stalker who thinks they become
empowered by doing web searches looking for personal information on
others; hardly surprising.

snip remaining babble


--
Jim Pennino

Of course the most interesting thing, Jim Pennino,WB6DKH,

The interesting thing is that this child thinks he needs bloviate
ad nauseam simply because it was pointed out to him that responding to
old USENET posts is not a good idea.

snip pointless verbal spew



I'm glad he has responded. Also glad he's doing well.

Mikek

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On Monday, April 24, 2017 at 2:35:02 PM UTC-4, amdx wrote:
On 4/23/2017 3:49 PM, wrote:
On Sunday, April 23, 2017 at 3:25:07 PM UTC-4, rickman wrote:
On 4/23/2017 3:00 PM, wrote:
On Sunday, April 23, 2017 at 1:46:05 PM UTC-4, wrote:
wrote:
On Wednesday, March 1, 2017 at 12:31:10 AM UTC-5, wrote:
wrote:
On Monday, August 5, 2013 at 12:52:47 PM UTC-4, amdx wrote:
This newsgroup is very slow.
I remember fondly when Chip was here taking a beating
here for discussing his Fractal Antenna.
At least there was some enthusiasm shown.
Mikek

Well Mike, I certainly don't hang around people whose idea of a good time is to pull the feathers off a live eagle.

Sory to be 'so slow'; lotsa cool fractal antenna action. Its good to be da king!

You are responding to something that is nearly 4 years old.


--
Jim Pennino

Indeed.

Success has its compromises--like not having the time to respond to defamatory statements inveighed thru this 'news'group. You guys need to grow up and accept the fact that fractal antennas work as stated (by me) and are here to stay. This despite the bitterness of (some) bashing hams-- who (curiously!)died early; some of you call that the 'fractal curse'---- and others with nothing but time on their hands. I have a very good memory gentlemen; not all of you were so profoundly unkind, and I thank those few for their reasonable queries and responses. The rest of you got your own instant karma. IMO.

I am doing very FB. And enjoying myself immensely, but with a jam packed schedule. With no time for those who sit around trying to bash the already proven. Yawn.

Flower children grown thorns.

Jealous? Tuff:-)!

You are responding to something that is nearly 2 months old.

--
Jim Pennino

No Jim;

I am responding to a bunch of-- old men-- who thought it was cool to bash others. Now go play with your grandkids or dog. I am not fresh meat for bashing.

I'm not very good at remembering people in newsgroups, there is just a
printed name and some talk which is not enough to form much of an image
in my mind. I think I recall jim as being a real piece of work, but I'm
not certain I have the right guy. I want to say the person I recall
actually tried tracking down my history and claimed I wasn't a degreed
engineer. lol

People like that aren't even worth the response. I find it interesting
that so far he has only commented on the fact that you don't return to
the group very often. Nothing of value to say at all.

I don't think I've seen any of your fractal antenna work. I would be
interested. Is there a link?

--

Rick C
Well Rick,

Loss of memory is a common attribute of aging. I can't help you on that..

I can say that Jim's complaint of time--BTW call for Jim Pennino is WB6DKH--is also a common issue with aging.

What brought me back, Rick, was the ---admission of cruelty-- by one of your pals here on the 'news' group. And many of you looked back with nostalgic tears of 'beating'.

I just thought y'all like to know that I am so glad that I have been able to age so well, and watch those who dispense with cruelty age so poorly.

Not sure where you fall there Rick, so let's leave it at that. I wouldn't want the display of facts to be confused with cruelty.

As for me, I have no complaints on 'time', such as Jim points out. Time has been very good to me, for those who help themselves, and then help others.

So, to use the word of the hour, 'beat' that, OM.

Regards. Busy writing a patent and you guys have nothing to say, it would seem.


I hope you don't remember my as one that was cruel. I was always
hopeful that you had something new. And indeed you did.
I only posted because the group is so slow and when you were here, it
wasn't!
Now, if they could just prove LENR, I've been following that for 6
years, with little to show except a lot of big companies looking into it.
Mikek

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

Ok Mike,

Thanks for being reasonable. I wish you the best.

You might be interested in my fractal battery patent, which issues May 9 as 9,647,271.

73
Chip W1YW

On 4/24/2017 10:37 AM, wrote:
On Monday, August 5, 2013 at 12:52:47 PM UTC-4, amdx wrote:
This newsgroup is very slow.
I remember fondly when Chip was here taking a beating
here for discussing his Fractal Antenna.
At least there was some enthusiasm shown.
Mikek

Here it is for everyone to see:"enthusiasm for BEATING".

Aren't you ASHAMED of yourself??

And are we to infer that:'Where's Chip When You Need him" is a cry for further individuals to cyberbully?

I am waiting for sober voices to apologize to me--here, publicly-- so that the kids and dreamers are corrected from thinking you are cruel and a cyberbully, a so are your cohorts.

Be a man and apologize.


Well, I'm sorry.
But I think you misinterpret my intentions.
The enthusiasm I referred to was from you, you had an idea
and ran hard with it.
Look back, you will see I was on your side, although
I can't say I had any great understanding.
Mikek

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus