Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#30
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/27/2014 4:45 AM, Ian Jackson wrote:
In message , Brian Reay writes Jerry Stuckle wrote: There are moderated groups where he can't get up to his tricks. You've seen his false attempts at technical threads, they are no more than vehicles for abuse, as you've seen. Brian, Actually, I do think they are attempts of technical threads, within his limited capacity of understanding. But they quickly result in abusive responses when his fallacies are pointed out. His understanding is certainly limited, there is other evidence to support that, but as for attempts at improving understanding, why does recycle the same topics again and again? Some have been around the block several times, even though they have been explained. He makes no attempt to digest the responses he receives, beyond twisting highlights to further his barrage of abuse. Why is this obvious? Well, he rubbishes perfectly valid answers and even, on occasions, goes on to rewrite history as if he has 'found a book' which explains things. The question is, why? Do a search for Westinghouse in the archive of uk.railway I really think that Rick's advice is best, Here is a guy I think I can like... although I wouldn't go as far as to "treat him as if he were the devil incarnate and refuse to even look his way much less mention his name". Well, I guess that took a left turn... He has, on the odd occasion, some very valid points to make. Yes, you are very right. However, you have to be careful, as this is sometimes just a ploy (conscious or otherwise) to draw you into what you think is a normal, civilised discussion, and it rapidly turns out not to be. The important thing is not prolong pointless arguments, otherwise you risk getting tarred with the same brush. Yes, that is the entire point. But I wouldn't use the term, "prolong", I would suggest that people just be aware that much of what Gareth posts will be pointing in the direction of an irrational argument and only responding to the rational parts. Even all this blather about ignoring or not ignoring is getting very tedious. I seem to recall I came to this group a couple of years ago hoping to learn about loop antennas. Maybe I should start a thread... -- Rick |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|